.

Traffic Enforcement Leads to Testy Medford Council Exchange

Councilor Marks, Officer MacGilvray argue over Medford traffic enforcement figures.

Comments by Medford City Councilor Michael Marks about city enforcement of traffic of violations drew the ire of a Medford Police officer, who engaged in a fiery exchange with Marks at Tuesday's council meeting.

Marks brought up a recent WBZ I-Team report that highlighted the cities and towns where Massachusetts residents may be most likely to get a moving violation.

Both in terms of total moving violations and violations per capita, Medford ranked dead last of over 30 municipalities surveyed by WBZ. While Brookline was tops 26,202 moving violations, Medford had just 631 during the same time period.

"I was quite appalled to find out...Medford was the very last community on the list," Marks said.

He quoted Brookline Police Chief Daniel O'Leary, who was interviewed in the WBZ report, as saying the heightened traffic enforcement acts as an overall crime deterrent for the city.

"It would act to calm down traffic and add to pedestrian safety and it would also act as a deterrent to potential crime," Marks said of Medford possibly following Brookline's path. "It's a win-win situation."

Marks also said the city is losing out on additional revenue by not providing more traffic enforcement.

"The directive has to come from the top," Marks said. "We have two people in our traffic enforcement division, a sergeant and an officer. Unless they are working seven days a week, 24 hours a day, we're not providing safe streets. It's impossible."

Marks wanted a response from Medford Police Chief Leo A. Sacco, Jr., on WBZ's report.

"I think he should be answering to this report," Marks said.

Medford Officer Harold MacGilvray approached the council following Marks' remarks to challenge his assertions. MacGilvray, speaking on behalf of the Medford Police Patrolman's Association, took issue with how Marks, and the council, were hammering the department.

"There is not another department in this city that absorbs the kinds of blows that the Medford Police Department absorbs from this council," MacGilvray said. "It is unbelievable. It's a common theme here that we aren't doing our jobs."

MacGilvray asked Marks if he knew how many patrol cars are on the streets of Brookline and Medford on normal day shifts. MacGilvray said Brookline utilizes 15 while Medford uses six.

"You said the streets aren't safe," MacGilvray said. "That's a shot at us."

"You better believe I believe they're not safe," Marks said, although when pressed by MacGilvray for specific statistics to back up that claim, Marks could not provide them.

"I'm tired of the constant shots at the Medford Police Department," MacGilvray said. "We do our job. We do a tremendous job with what little resources we have."

Marks said many times he was not intentionally taking shots at the department and apologized to MacGilvray if what he was saying was being perceived that way.

"I'm sorry your feelings were hurt," Marks said. "I'm not here to represent you or your union. I'm here to represent the people of this community. And if I feel there's a concern, I'm going to raise it, whether you like it or not."

Council President Robert Maiocco didn't want MacGilvray to believe the council doesn't think Medford Police aren't doing their job.

"Personally, I feel safe in my neighborhood," Maiocco said.

Councilor Breanna Lungo-Koehn said the council doesn't believe the department has enough manpower and it's up to Mayor Michael J. McGlynn to "step up" with a plan to change that.

"The Medford Police Department is always there to respond to needs of this community," said Councilor Paul Camuso. "Enforcement is always an issue, but the men and women, we can stand by them whether we have philosophical differences or not."

Jeanne Martin February 10, 2013 at 01:35 AM
Matt, I hope the Mayor hears you. Our taxes have been kept low because we haven't done proper maintenance on our city's buildings and streets. The city taxes are going up, there is no two ways about it. What can be and should be mitigated is by how much. Our Mayor wants to impress the new young urban professionals, the people at the State House and Boston. He does this with his eye candy projects, the garage, Brooks Estate, and Water Taxi. Yet he can't fix the double pole problem. To the new yuppies coming in to Medford, please don't let the mayor pull the wool over your eyes. Maybe you don't care, but your kids will. It is your kids money you'll be spending. Should you play along with the mayor and get your candy today, tomorrow you will be asked to pay for the infrastructure when it costs a lot more than it would now. So, if you want to turn Medford into Wellsley - go for it, we know the Mayor listens to you. But when your pushed out of Medford for high taxes when your in your 60's and have lost your job, don't come crying to me. Yuppies, don't bite from the apple. Think smart and if you can't think smart - think about what you are strapping your own kids with. Respectfully, Jeanne Martin
U Sam February 11, 2013 at 07:21 PM
Good for you officer. I just wish you had some sane supporters. Why is it everyone is such an authority on policing? It seems it is the only career everyone could do better but doesn't do. Why is that?
Frank Mulligan February 11, 2013 at 07:39 PM
Folks Please keep one thing in MIND for as long as Michael Mc Glynn is in OFFICE. The city will remain the same. The city council is supporting you tax PAYERS 105 %. Not Mc Glynn. Good Luck to the Police.
Frank Mulligan February 11, 2013 at 07:42 PM
Folks If you saw the CONDITION the police station is in. It would tell you why, I say get RID of Mc Glynn. It's a SHAME the POLICE halfta work in. The Buifing inspector shoul SHUT IT DOWN.
benti55 February 15, 2013 at 03:37 PM
Kept our taxes low? Mine have doubled since I got my house. The police are in a building that should be condemned. It is a disgrace that people paid to protect us have to work in those conditions. As for F Mulligans comment, yes it will stay the same as long as McGlynn is in office.He is the one who costs our city $. We have a curb to curb ordinance for utilities that dig up streets. Does he enforce that , no the streets are patched. That cost us money. When they dug at Medford Sq. they dug up brick crosswalks that we paid for, and replace it with macadam. We cannot afford to keep cutting police and expect them to do more. Just keeping up with drugs in this community, especially Salem St., requires a whole police Dept.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »