patching...
Update: Missing 10-Year-Old Found in Melrose »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices

Data Driven Education


3 Part Series on Education  


Data Driven Education

Data has proven to be invaluable as a tool to identify weak spots in curriculum and also as a way to identify students in need of academic intervention. With the focus on data, something else happened.  Education leaders, administrators, and teachers weren't talking about students as individuals, instead we began to hold data meetings and we started to refer to students simply as "above grade level", "at grade level", "progressing, but below grade level", or "needs improvement".  And instead of just missing a student as a person when they moved away, teachers began to lament they weren't going to be able to claim standardized test scores of the academically talented students.  At the same time, new students test scores began to be the first thing we checked to see how their scores would affect overall data for the upcoming testing season.  All of a sudden, students scores dominated conversation.  Those scores also now dominate teacher accountability and even the real estate markets in a given town.

We need an education reality check.  I recently, "Liked" a Facebook posting that read "I Care More About the Person My Students Become Than The Scores On The Tests They Take".  This doesn't mean I don't care about test scores and data.  It does mean that society needs people who have integrity and character. Learning and test scores are important as a way of measuring what students are learning.  Does it measure smart? What does smart mean?  Does it strictly mean a high test score?  Personally, I think data and test scores are part of the puzzle. Students can explain a concept but often can't write it.  Students can demonstrate a concept by creating a project but they may not be able to read a word or understand a word on a standardized test and lose points.  
Students need extra academic supports to increase their capacity to learn. Students with learning, physical, and emotional disorders also need special supports.  

Our schools need to be the center point of our communities because our children are the center point of our future.  If we invest in supporting our children academically and emotionally, we will invest in children who can not only answer questions right but also can face challenges and seek solutions.

Data is defining the self worth of our children, the value of a dedicated, compassionate caring teacher, and the marketability of our homes. 

Mary Hampton

7:52 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013

I applaud your comments in our Blog, Kathy. I'll be following it from now on. Good work!

Reply

paul surette

1:32 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

There is 'data' for under-performing or under-achieving students. It's called TEST SCORES! Jesus

Reply

Anna Bucciarelli

6:34 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

And, how about collecting data for under performing instructors ????

Reply

Kathleen Sullivan

9:49 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Thank you for the comments and the feedback. Ms. Bucciarelli there is an extensive evaluation tool in place for all public school educators which require us to set goals, collect evidence, and be observed on a regular basis. Each public educator is required to keep a 3 inch binder which is a collection of documentation on our performance as educators. You can find the outline of this evaluation tool on MA Dept. of Education website. http://www.doe.mass.edu/edeval/model/

Reply

AnnieOMalden

11:00 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Thank you Kathy for recognizing these students as people and not just numbers. Those young people come to you every day with baggage they didn't ask for. We do need to offer support services when necessary as it will come to bite us later if we don't. The Teen Center is a little piece of the puzzle yet the elementary level needs attention as well. It does take a village!

Reply

paul surette

7:00 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

I have a question for you, Miss Sullivan....can YOU PASS the MCAS yourself?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Diana

9:09 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

... he hilariously asked, while demonstrating random unnecessary capitalization and improper use of an ellipsis.

Comment_arrow

Mary Hampton

2:16 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

I know Ms. Sullivan is extremely intelligent and a highly successful teacher. Obtaining an advanced degree is a bit more difficult than passing the MCAS.

Anna Bucciarelli

9:13 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Ms Sullivan ... it appears to me that an instructor holding on to his/her own performance binder is an exercise in futility. That said, friend the person evaluating and you get A+'s ll the way. More than meets the eye here, methinks. (To Paul's point, can you pass the test and, further, how many public educators can?)

Reply

Anna Bucciarelli

9:22 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Diana ... what's so improper about the question? Seems logical to me to wonder.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Diana

9:34 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Why? Is there anything about Ms. Sullivan's writing that would indicate to you that she's not capable of passing the MCAS? She seems to understand that an ellipsis is not a comma substitute, unlike you and Paul.

Anna Bucciarelli

9:38 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Diana ... not referring solely to Sullivan ... keep your shirt on, I don't even know what an ellipsis is, no less use them !!! If I do, I am not aware they even have a name. I, for one, could probably never pass an MCAS, but I do reserve the right to question the questioners.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Diana

9:45 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

... = ellipsis. It's meant to indicate an unfinished thought, an intentional omission of words to be mentally filled in by the reader. As an example "Dude, there's no reason to think Ms. Sullivan couldn't pass the MCAS." means exactly what it says. "Dude... there's no reason to think Ms. Sullivan couldn't pass the MCAS." means "Dude, you're being kind of a jerk here."

Anna Bucciarelli

10:06 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Diana ... my use of ... is not to indicate any unfinished thought or omission, it is simply my way of separating my thoughts as I write. Thanks for the explanation ... I will continue to use my dots and dashes as I apply no meaning to them other than what I've expressed here. I try to be grammatically and punctuation-ally correct (is there such a word?) but even the best of us make an error occasionally and my spelling leaves much to be desired, I admit. Fact is, I have only been on this computer for less than 2 years and am constantly learning new things, (some thanks to Paul >:), and how folks choose to view my comments is entirely out of my hands ... and I don't really care and my choice is to disregard all insults and express my thoughts honestly and as I see fit.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Diana

10:22 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Okay, but it's wrong. And perhaps seeing the way you insist on being wrong even when you've been taught the correct way will give you some insight into exactly how hard Ms. Sullivan's job actually is.

Comment_arrow

Ron Powell

1:54 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013

According to the Chicago Manual of Style, the ellipsis can be used to indicate a pause in the flow of a sentence. This is precisely the way that both Anna and paul used it. And in digital communication, an ellipsis is an acceptable way to indicate a natural pause. Source: http://eprints.port.ac.uk/3682/

Comment_arrow

Ron Powell

1:58 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013

And just to be clear: Anna and paul are using the ellipsis correctly, and Diana is wrong. I also note that Diana used the ellipsis exactly the way she claims is the "wrong" way. LOL!

Comment_arrow

Mike G.

3:41 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Actually, what the Chicago Manual of Style says is this:

“Ellipsis points suggest faltering or fragmented speech accompanied by confusion, insecurity, distress, or uncertainty.”

"...a number of style guides say that ellipses can be used to indicate a pause or falter in dialog, the passage of time, an unfinished list, or that a speaker has trailed off in the middle of a sentence or left something unsaid (1, 2, 3, 4)."

http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/ellipsis.aspx

Sources:
1. Shaw, H. Punctuate It Right. New York: Harper Paperbacks, 1993, p. 105.
2. The Chicago Manual of Style. 14th Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993, p. 368.
3. Goldstein, N. ed. The Associated Press Stylebook and Libel Manual. Reading: Perseus Books, 1998, p. 272.
4. Woods, G. English Grammar for Dummies. Hoboken: Wiley Publishing, 2001, p. 331.

Comment_arrow

Ron Powell

1:23 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013

So in other words, Mike, you corrected my point that the ellipsis can be used to indicate a pause to inform me that, actually, an ellipsis can be used toi indicate a pause. Was there anything about my paraphrasing that failed to capture the essence of the rules for using an ellipsis?

Mike, the CMOS devotes FOUR PAGES to the ellipsis, and you chose to cite one paragraph. Anna and paul both used the ellipsis in the correct way -- by the CMOS, MLA, and by the way that the ellipsis is conventionally used in digital communication.

One final note: proper use of the ellipsis is perhaps the least important thing that the MCAS measures. The purpose of the MCAS is to measure a pupil's understanding of basic math, science, and analytical/critical reasoning abilities. I don't think that the personal comment about Ms. Sullivan was appropriate or fair to her (obviously she is very bright); however, I cannot believe that this evolved into a debate about punctuation. Punctuation and grammar are all about clarity and being understood by others, and I think that paul's writing was very clearly understood by all.

Comment_arrow

Mike G.

4:01 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Using an ellipsis in place of a comma is not acceptable anytime, anywhere. Note that it's a pause in the midst of a sentence, not at the start of it.

Furthermore, I corrected your misquoting of the CMOS. If you're going to quote a source to prove someone's point incorrect, you might as well quote it correctly.

Anna Bucciarelli

3:38 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Oh, for Heaven's sake ... who ever said she doesn't work hard? My simple question was about the collection of data on instructors as well as students. A simple answer would suffice but I don't think I got one. I am not criticizing Sullivan, I am simply saying that data collection works for instructors as well as students. Period.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Diana

3:45 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

They do data collection on teachers. That binder she referred to isn't a collection of A pluses and gold stars that she gives to herself. It's her students' test scores, among other measurable pieces of data.

Anna Bucciarelli

6:06 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Ok, glad to finally get a good answer and I appreciate it. Having worked for years in a school department (town not to be mentioned here) I observed disfunction in a teacher or two that went unnoticed or disregarded. Just so you know where I'm coming from. In no way do I wish to minimize the efforts of educators, I think there is no more noble profession (except perhaps parenthood). I am simply speaking from past observations which were disturbing to me and have stayed with me. Any defender of the position must admit that there are occasions when a bad apple appears in the bunch ... that's all I'm saying, I do not in any way wish to appear not to appreciate the effort exerted or the good intentions of good teachers. Wrong it may be but ... helps me to get my thoughts in order. Has not a thing to do with my education, it is simply my habit.

Reply
Comment_arrow

paul surette

12:52 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

Anna, it looks like you got sucked in by Diana. I too had that happen once. Then I got counseling, and got better. I still laugh at what Broadway Jay called her when he said she was 'intellectually poverty stricken'. :)

Comment_arrow

Mike G.

1:17 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

I have to laugh at Broadway Jay insulting anyone's intelligence, quite frankly.

Kathleen Sullivan

10:30 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Thank you for everyone's comments. The point of the article was to simply point out that data is extremely valuable but it should not be the only way we measure progress and success in our students.

I chose teaching as a second career choice. It is the most rewarding and the most difficult job I've had. There is never a day I leave my classroom that I don't feel as though I've made a difference but also there is never a day that the kids don't enlighten me in some way, even on the most difficult of days.

For the record, I have all the necessary degrees (master's in education) and 3 educator licenses which label me as a highly qualified teacher. I continue my education by taking courses throughout the year and by being an active member in education reform. In the end, labels, licenses, and degrees are part of the picture. It's what teachers do in the classroom and beyond to enhance the quality of education, it's what teachers do to support the students that need extra help, and it's what teachers do behind the scenes to help their students that often goes unnoticed and without need of recognition. It's what we do.

Reply

paul surette

12:50 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

Again, Miss Sullivan, while Massachusetts educators attempt to 'wow' everyone with data, the only data that counts are test scores. If a child gets a 60 on their test, they fail. If they get a 90, they pass. Pretty neat concept, huh? So pie-chart away all you want....I'll take the time tested method of either getting an A or D. And I don't need data to explain a test score.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Diana

6:58 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

I think you might. A 60 is a D. It ain't good, but it's technically passing.

Anna Bucciarelli

6:21 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

I don't think so Paul ... I can and do admire individuals in any profession who put their heart and soul into their work but I also know that they are not all equal and there are those who collect their pay and vacations with very little effort and slacking off, letting kids fend for themselves ... I have witnessed it. Further, I know for certain that the binder has in it evaluations by superiors and my point, above, about friends giving A+'s still holds ... care not at all about the defense posed by Diana and I can take all the insults she volleys toward me since I'm secure in my personal integrity and intelligence and have no fear about expressing my thoughts and try hard to be civil ... too bad if people don't agree and want to swipe at my "ellipses" (what a joke!) since they cannot logically attack me for my opinions ... we all have them and we sometimes differ, plain and simple. I just wonder what her strong defense indicates ... all I can think is that she teaches and wants the kudos? Or, perhaps, she is a "friend"?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Diana

6:55 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

I'm neither a teacher nor a friend of Ms. Sullivan's, I'm just wildly entertained at watching a pair of illiterates tell a teacher about how to educate.

Leaving aside admittedly minor (if willfully ignorant) grammatical errors, you and Paul are both arguing with something that Ms. Sullivan never actually said. Your reading comprehension is abysmal. Neither of you appear to know what "data" actually means. let alone notice that Ms. Sullivan offered neither a defense nor a condemnation of it. Your opinions are worthless not just because they're uninformed, but because that's how you like them. You can't teach people who don't want to learn because that might mean that they're not already right.

Anna Bucciarelli

8:23 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

Diana ... put a pipe in it. No need for nastiness here, or insulting folks you are uninformed about. Opinions, including yours, are never worthless, they are simply an expression of one's thoughts. As for illiteracy, and grammatical incorrectness, show me where. You yourself are no champion of correct writing, let me point out. Paul and I are not arguing "with", but "about" what is stated by Sullivan. You cannot dispute the fact that students' grades speak very loudly about teacher performance regardless of all the data that is collected; the bottom line is how the student fairs in the end that demonstrates the capability of the instructor. What makes you smart enough to condemn others for simple questions and remarks that have not a thing to do with you personally? You may not be a teacher but you insist upon "teaching" people and persuading them to your way of thinking with such angst simply because you disagree with them?

Reply

paul surette

11:37 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

Anna, honestly, you're wasting your time with Diana. Broadway Jay got it right when he called her 'intellectually poverty stricken'. That's all Diana has ever done, is call me names. By the way, DIANA, it's been proven that since day 1 of the MCAS, every year, Massachusetts, has dumbed down the MCAS to get most to pass, so that the state can get their federal funding. Everyone can pass a test if you dumb it down, even YOU! Teachers do have a difficult task of teaching kids, especially the ones that come from broken homes, where the parents are not involved with their kids. THOSE parents expect the school system to raise their kids. I was friends with a woman who was NOT involved in her kids school work, as she was and IS too busy partying. I told her this, and we are no longer friends because of it. I tell it like it is. Sorry if moonbats like you are offended by the truth. And if you bothered to read what Miss Sullivan wrote, here's a refresher course "Each public educator is required to keep a 3 inch binder which is a collection of documentation on our performance as educators." The way THAT statement was written implies that Miss Sullivan keeps a binder, of her own work!

Reply

paul surette

11:38 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

Diana, reading is fundamental....try it sometime!

Reply

Anna Bucciarelli

2:52 pm on Monday, January 7, 2013

Paul ... please "splain" what is meant by Joe's :-). Someday I'll manage to remember more than the one I love most that you taught me, >:) !!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

paul surette

5:31 pm on Monday, January 7, 2013

Anna, :) just means Joe liked your comment. And I'm pretty sure he's not a fan of 'IT' either.

paul surette

5:03 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Mike, I can't even begin to tell you how many books I've read where an ellipsis has been used. I use them at times, as well as capital letters, as a way to emphasize a point. For the record, the only time I use an ellipsis, is on this website, as I feel in order to make my point so that even the intellectually poverty stricken folks like Diana (love that phrase, and thank you broadwayjay) can comprehend what I'm saying. Many people who post on this site suffer from selective reading skills. Therefore, an ellipsis is a way of 'getting through to' them, leaving very little room for interpretation.

Reply

Diana

6:34 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013

I have no problem at all believing that paul can't count the books he's read.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Anna Bucciarelli

7:24 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013

And can you? Got a book list? How many books do you read in a week, or month, or even a year? How many books do you pride yourself in needing to read a 2nd or 3rd time because it is simply very wonderful or enlightening? Do you ever recommend a good read to someone or do you continually recommend the proper use of the English (I prefer to call it the "American") language and correct grammar, punctuation, proper use of ellipses and chastising individuals who have opinions other than yours, offering snide remarks about their intelligence when you are totally unaware of their personal habits and/or the lives they lead? Drawing conclusions without proof and knowledge is a dangerous sport.

david mokal

9:40 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Well Im too stoooopid for this post. Im used to readin,writin,n rithmatic. It worked in my day we sent astronuts to the moon ok. Wasnt any MCAS to do it either.Good greif my ink is running out of my puter. Nuttin else to say. Battle of the Brains haaaaaaaaaa

Reply
Comment_arrow

Anna Bucciarelli

6:03 am on Monday, February 4, 2013

David ... all people have brains. How thoughtful they are and how they use their intelligence is another question and I believe that even "stooopid" folks often come up with wisdoms at times. In the Big Apple, long ago when I was a student in the public schools, there was no MCAS but we did need to pass the Regents exam to graduate from HS ... don't know if that's still the case, but the test was summary of all we should have learned in 12 years. Imagine that? Do times really change that much?

Comment_arrow

Anna Bucciarelli

6:05 am on Monday, February 4, 2013

Some people think you do need to be a nut to travel into the unknown. Not saying I do, just an observation on my part.

paul surette

10:20 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Mr. Mokal....you have any idea what was going on down near Broadway & Salem St. last night? I was told the police had the street blocked off and there was a helicopter lurking about.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike G.

10:57 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Wasn't there a car accident there?

paul surette

10:24 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Anna, the last good book I read was Pat Buchanan's Hitler, Churchill, and the Unnecessary War: How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World. It's his opinion on how we got involved in World War 2, and how maybe, it could have been avoided. I recommend it. :>)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Anna Bucciarelli

6:25 am on Monday, February 4, 2013

Thanks for that recommendation. I particularly like anything to do with WWII, even fictional accounts and movies. Biographies are always great and am now on Jon Meecham's Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power. Can't recommend, tho, since I just started it but it's lookin' good. Next on my list is The Passage of Power: the Years of Lyndon Johnson by Robert A. Caro, then on to The Last Lion: Winston Spencer Churchill: Defender of the Realm, 1940-1965, by Wm. Manchester & Paul Reid. Can never exhaust the list of biographies but, in between, I will delight myself with simple fiction ... have a list of favorite authors I go to for escapism.

Leave a comment