patching...
Update: Don't "like" Malden Patch on Facebook? What are you thinking?! Click here to get Malden's headlines in your newsfeed, as they happen. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

TELL US: How Would You Feel About Having a Marijuana Dispensary in Town?

The medical marijuana ballot initiative passed on Tuesday, which means up to 35 medical marijuana dispensaries can open in 2013. Would you be OK with having one in town?

 

 

Medical marijuana is coming to Massachusetts. The question is: where?

The medical marijana ballot initiative that passed in Tuesdays election with 63 percent voter approval means that up to 35 medical marijuana dispensaries can open up in the state in 2013.

The new law goes into effect January 1, but requires rules and regulations be set up by the Department of Public Health.

Some towns and cities, such as Quincy, reportedly are already trying to line up regulations that would keep dispensaries out of their municipalities, which have proved troublesome in some of the nine states where medical marijuana dispensaries have been legal.

What do you think? Is this a classic case of NIMBY (fine, but Not In My Back Yard)? Or do medical marijuana dispensaries really not make sense in your town, but they're fine somewhere else — and if so, why? Tell us in our comments section below. 

Related Topics: Medical Marijuana Massachusetts, Medical marijuana, marijuana dispensaries, and medical marijuana ballot initiative

Fumler

4:44 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I hope a Marijuana dispensary comes to Westford, Already 2 Market Baskets and lots of pot smoke over at the high school it would fit in fine,

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nancy Drago

8:09 pm on Saturday, November 24, 2012

My TOWN, 'MELROSE', MA WON'T EVEN ALLOW A LIQUOR STORE OR MCDONALD'S. A POT DISPENSARY ISN'T NECESSARY! JUST VISIT THE PAPA GINO'S BACK PARKING LOT ON A FRIDAY NIGHT, THE KIDS ARE ALL THERE,
Mayor Dolan ....

Steve Crane

5:17 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I want one, literally, in my back yard.

Reply

John Gault

5:50 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I don't think Chelmsford is a good place one for one. With the constant power outages, the hydroponics would be all messed up. Plus, we're a Tom Brady football throw away from Lowell, so there's no need to have two of anything.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bill. S

8:07 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Brady cant throw the ball that far. never could. dink and dunk

Comment_arrow

Upset

4:54 pm on Sunday, November 11, 2012

Hey,are you an EMPLOYMENT AGENCY? How come I NEVER GOT A JOB FROM YOU?!

Comment_arrow

Upset

4:59 pm on Sunday, November 11, 2012

I am talking about the guy above Bill S.'s box !

Comment_arrow

Upset

5:36 pm on Sunday, November 11, 2012

Did you know that I away get a JOB,do you know HOW I got the JOB? Well it all start out at the hospital .A nurse told me to fill up the BOTTLE in the MEN ROOM ! THAT HOW I GOT THE JOB!!!

Rob

6:28 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I'd like to see one in Reading.

Reply

Phil Krackenhauser

7:18 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Arlington should get one, maybe two.

The Board of Selectmen could put one near a public school so that the young Democrats could get experience with dope before going to college. When the dopes flunk out of college after running up a huge debt through student loans, which will be forgiven by Senator Liawatha, they can play beer pong with former elected officials on Friday nights at her house and urinate on the nearby elementary schools completing the circle.

The other bong bar should go near Town Hall, so the potheads who run Arlington would not need to travel far for their fix before banning things that might be harmful to residents, like soda.

Reply
Comment_arrow

saul glick

9:43 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Totally awesome, and funny.

Comment_arrow

Rick

8:15 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

You seem like a dude whos beliefs are 'true' and will not falter, therefore I won't even try to persuade you your attitude towards cannabis is probably bigoted.

But dude, your comment was hilarious. Haha!

Tom

7:28 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

The first prototype Marijuana Dispensary should be in Gov Duval's town. It would be best for our Gov to get the kinks out first hand.

Reply

Mike

7:42 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Tewksbury would be a great spot they can put it next to Save on Smokes lol

Reply

david mokal

8:12 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Down at the Malden T Station they can blend in with the rest

Reply

Jodie Dow-Novaes

8:18 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

It would not be a problem as far as I am concerned - if we voted to have them, it makes no sense to then refuse to have them here.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jodie Dow-Novaes

8:22 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

oops - forgot to put the city - (Somerville)

June Shrewsbury

8:20 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

we already have more than our share in our backyards, I don't care how much money it brings to the city, say no and find somewhere else,

Reply
Comment_arrow

Margo

3:17 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

It would bring no money to the any city. They are all non profit organizations.

Comment_arrow

maldenmike

11:57 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

non-profit, but still taxed, dumby.

Comment_arrow

MaldenJen

12:19 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

@MaldenMike: What would be taxed? The marijuana itself? Non-profits generally do not pay taxes (that's kind of the whole point of that designation). In any case, I'm not being facetious, I really want to know if there is any financial benefit to the towns that will "host" these things. My gut reaction is a big NO to having one in Malden. How about identifying which towns had the highest percentage of eligible voters who voted 'yes" for them, and stick them there. Or take the 50% of towns with the least proportion of support and exempt them...

mike

8:26 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

It's not like these kids will be robbing the people coming out of the dispensary....

Reply

Phil E

8:36 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Put them all in Cambridge right next to the mansions.

Reply

Anita

8:45 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Oh, there's not one already? Why not, there's every other drug being dispensed in Malden. We don't have control of the illegal, what makes you think there will be control on the legal?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Diana

9:24 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Erm... because the whole point of making it legal is to regulate and tax it? See "booze."

Davim

8:51 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Any place where homeowners do not care about their property value.

Reply

Donald Mei

9:17 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

If the area is zoned appropriately for a restaurant or retail space, I could not care less. Anyone with half a brain knows that marijuana is a less powerful drug than alcohol. People are not violent or destructive when they are high, in contrast to drunk people.

Reply

Go Spartans

9:17 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I voted NO for it and can't believe that people would actually want one in their neighborhoods! Don't you see all the downsides - our children will now be exposed, how many more people will now be addicted and with that comes crimes. For those that truly need it the doctors were already getting them what they needed.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bobby James

9:28 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

You ever met somebody addicted to weed? SMH...

Comment_arrow

Dirk Anderson

11:40 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Wow, our children will be exposed???? Thank god our kids have no idea where to find it now.

Comment_arrow

Donald Mei

4:18 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

The whole problem with pot is that it is a gateway drug. i.e. a relatively benign, inexpensive drug through which people establish relationships with dealers who push more costly and addictive drugs.

If you make pot legal, you eliminate that entirely. Pot becomes like cigarettes or liquor. Legally sold, regulated and taxed.

Comment_arrow

Donald Mei

4:21 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Bobby is absolutely right. Weed is not addictive. One other thing. Have you ever seen someone pick a fight while they are on weed? Have you ever seen someone beat their wife/kid/girlfriend while on weed? I didn't think so.

As someone who has known people who both smoked too much weed and people who drank too much alcohol, I can tell you that the pot smoker was MUCH MUCH less dangerous to others than the drunk was.

Comment_arrow

Ann B

9:48 pm on Saturday, November 10, 2012

I am ok with one in my town, as it will be convenient for my husband who has MS.

Comment_arrow

Anastasia O'Malley

11:32 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012

Ann B,

You've probably been told there is no stopping MS, but if there was a chance to help your husband reverse MS instead of treat MS symptoms would you look into it? If so...

http://www.youcanbeatms.com

http://www.thewahlsfoundation.com/category/the-wahls-diet/

http://www.swankmsdiet.org/About%20The%20Diet

I hope he turns out to be one of the many to whom "normal" life is returnable.

Comment_arrow

Alison

1:16 pm on Saturday, November 24, 2012

First if all unless you are planning on locking your children away from the world, they will be exposed. Secondly marijuana is not addictive. I smoke and have on and off since high school, and I am not addicted, nor do I know anyone who is. I do however know a number of alcoholics, and alcohol is readily available, there are 4 liquor store within walking distance of my house. And lastly I have Multiple Sclerosis. I have very painful almost constant muscle spasms. Over the counter pain meds do not help. You say my doctor can provide me with what I need? Ooh you mean the medications he can prescribe for those symptoms, the ones that can cause renal failure, seizures and a laundry list of equally serious side effects. Not to mention if I want to STOP taking those meds, I have to be weaned off or I may experience hallucinations and seizures... Yes, Big Pharma... The solution to all my problems. I will stick to my yummy natural pot brownies I currently use for my muscle spasms, whose only potential side effect being the giggles and sleepiness.

Comment_arrow

Diana

9:44 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Well, you're quite the singular human then.

Comment_arrow

Bobby James

10:50 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Weed isn't an addiction. You don't go through withdrawals. Your body doesn't crave it. Do some people have a problem where they might smoke too much? Sure, just like Uncle Jerry at Thanksgiving eats too much turkey and drinks a few too many Bud LIghts.

OH THE HUMANITY!

Pats

9:58 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Winchester needs one. Already have a standout hospital, this just furthers the medical benefits to this town. Plus, pull more visitors to our downtown which can use a few extra shoppers. Gotta figure the quick-serve restaurants will do great!

Reply
Comment_arrow

paul surette

1:31 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

I like your thinking, Pat.....you'e thinking long term :)

Matt C

10:07 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

For better or worse every town is going to get one or many of them, I think we could preempt it by have it be sold a police stations across the state, that way we can ensure safe access for all citizens across the state and provide a means to fund our police forces!.

Reply

David

10:15 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

According to the law, MJ will be "dispensed" only to those who have a doctor-signed prescription for a prescribed daily dose for a diagnosed medical condition. It's not a place where anyone can walk in and buy pot. But will the system be abused by unscrupulous doctors writing bogus scripts for anyone who wants one? I am a medical doctor and while I don't see myself writing any scripts for MJ, I supported the measure as a way to allow for "off-label" experimentation with MJ for certain chronic pain or anorexic conditions. I also hope there will be sensible exploration of the benefits of different varieties of the cannabis plant and over time ideas will emerge about what varieties are better for what conditions. Medically speaking, I believe MJ's mind-altering properties are an unfortunate (and for some people dangerous) side effect and the greatest benefits will be found in some low-THC-content varieties. The success of the program wherever it is based, will depend on adequate supervision and regulation. Having a properly run dispensary next door should be no different from having an outpatient dialysis center next door.

Reply
Comment_arrow

paul surette

1:30 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

To David.....if it were YOU lying in a bed, suffering from chronic pain from terminal cancer, I can assure you that you would be singing a different tune! Until you've been there, leave the God complex at home!

Comment_arrow

david mokal

8:09 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Sorry but Vicodin,Zanex,Oxycodone is handed out like candy from Doctors. There is no regulation just a mask over it. Not here to dispute you but I know for a fact that there are Doctors right in our backyards that pass it out. One Doctor refuses they just go to another. There is no control like the government leads you to believe.

Gene Pinkham

10:26 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

"Addicted to weed"? Yeah, Dead Heads.

Reply

aDadaHomeOwner

10:30 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I lost both parents to cancer. Many patients lose their appetite, won't eat, and/or are suffering from pain. This is a controlled herb. Every pharmacist ought to toss an application in the ring. It's MEDICINAL, not recreational and regulated, right? Not a bar, not a bong, not a boutique, not for kids. The Commonwealth decided. To those terrified, note that there are still dry towns in Mass, and if 21 sites emerge, chances are good your backyard will not be part of this.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Matt C

11:00 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Lets be honest for a moment, the majority of people taking advantage of this will be using it for recreational purposes... Just like it is in CA where ANYONE can get a script for it for "headaches" or "stress" or "anxiety"

Comment_arrow

paul surette

1:27 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

aDadaHomeOwner....when my mother was terminally ill, and in pain from severe neuropathy from the chemo, she asked for pain medication.....the 250 pound plus Neanderthal of a nurse told her "no dear...we don't want you to become addicted". That alone was my fuel for voting yes on this question!

Delta Pearl

10:46 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

If it's being prescribed only for medical purposes, then why isn't it being dispensed at CVS and Rite Aide?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dirk Anderson

11:44 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Because they would be afraid to carry it due to the federal laws. Banks will not do business with dispenseries in Cali and other states because they could be charged with money laundering.

Comment_arrow

Margo

3:22 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

its not being prescribed. it is being recommended. Marijuana is a Schedule 1 drug. It is illegal federally.

As DOJ has said on many occasions, Congress has determined through the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) that marijuana is a Schedule I drug and as such growing, distributing, and possessing marijuana in any capacity save a federal research program is in “violation of federal law regardless of state laws permitting such activities” (U.S. DOJ, U.S. Attorneys Durkan and Ormsby, April 14, 2011). DOJ has further stated that “this core priority [of disrupting drug trafficking organizations] includes prosecution of business enterprises that unlawfully market and sell marijuana”(U.S. DOJ, U.S. Attorneys Durkan and Ormsby, April 14, 2011).

Comment_arrow

Margo

3:22 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Pharmacies can not carry ILLEGAL drugs

Rick R

10:55 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I think we have enough issues in our communities without thiese businesses being let in. Keep them in pharmacies is my thoughts about this. We have enough riff raff in Malden, Medford and Everett. Put the stores in Cambridge please.

Reply
Comment_arrow

paul surette

1:24 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

That's a good idea, Rick....I just happen to work in Cambridge :)

Comment_arrow

Margo

3:24 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Marijuana can not be in pharmacies. It is an ILLEGAL drug. It will not be prescribed. It can only be recommended by a doctor that will do it. Any 95% of all doctors in MA will not recommend it.

Comment_arrow

Lynette

8:14 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012

I agree. Even though the dispensary is for a good cause, I guess. Malden doesn't
need one. We just don't.

Somerville Home Owner

10:57 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I like Phil's comment. It is interesting that many of the same people who want to ban/control junk food want to legalise marijuana. At least we won't put the drug dealers out of business. They can switch to selling extra large sugary sodas with artificial flavors and colors. It's important in this economy that we keep everyone employed, even those with illegal jobs.

Reply

walter schofield

11:02 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Didn't vote for the initiative for this reason, and, you should see what it's done to California. Everyone there has "anxiety" and a prescription for pot. Dispensaries have been robbed numerous times. Don't get me wrong, I'm ok with folks smoking marijuana....but it should be legalized for everyone, not just medical purposes. Put it in a pack like cigarettes, sell it in liquor stores and have the state/feds tax it for a revenue stream. Sheez....what's so complicated?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ann B

9:52 pm on Saturday, November 10, 2012

I think that is the next step. See Colorado and Washington.

Comment_arrow

Margo

3:24 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

As DOJ has said on many occasions, Congress has determined through the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) that marijuana is a Schedule I drug and as such growing, distributing, and possessing marijuana in any capacity save a federal research program is in “violation of federal law regardless of state laws permitting such activities” (U.S. DOJ, U.S. Attorneys Durkan and Ormsby, April 14, 2011). DOJ has further stated that “this core priority [of disrupting drug trafficking organizations] includes prosecution of business enterprises that unlawfully market and sell marijuana”(U.S. DOJ, U.S. Attorneys Durkan and Ormsby, April 14, 2011).

Somerville Home Owner

11:05 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

On a serious note if you don't see the downsides to having one in your town or neighnorhood, you either don't care or haven't thought about it enough. Methadone clinics are regulated and nobody wants to live next to one. Same deal.

Reply
Comment_arrow

paul surette

1:23 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

I hate to tell you this, 'Summa-ville' but comparing methadone to marijuana is like comparing apples to oranges.

Alexis Karlin

12:00 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Melrose is already getting worse, I don't agree with this. Especially with the recent armed robbery. And having been robbed once in Melrose (at Christmas) was enough for me.

Reply
Comment_arrow

paul surette

1:26 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Lol, jesus Alexis.....people who get high from marijuana don't generally run around robbing banks or convenient stores. You're confused.

KarenL

12:48 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Place them in towns according to which towns had the highest percentage of "yes" votes...that way fewer people will be upset. Here's the 35 top "yes" towns:

Ashburnham 94.32%
Wendell 85.66%
Shutesbury 84.79%
Provincetown 84.75%
Mount Washington 83.81%
Amherst 82.96%
West Tisbury 82.00%
Leverett 81.77%
Aquinnah 81.29%
Northampton 81.22%
Pelham 80.28%
Ashfield 80.00%
Williamsburg 79.78%
Chilmark 79.14%
Cambridge 79.04%
Plainfield 78.82%
Gosnold 78.31%
Somerville 77.77%
Conway 77.72%
Cummington 77.56%
Alford 76.21%
Truro 76.17%
Becket 75.72%
Chesterfield 75.50%
Wellfleet 75.41%
Brookline 75.24%
Nantucket 75.16%
Egremont 75.13%
Shelburne 75.02%
Hawley 74.87%
Tisbury 74.18%
New Marlborough 73.95%
Williamstown 73.07%
Greenfield 73.01%
Sunderland 72.73%

Reply
Comment_arrow

DannyBoy

12:56 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

KarenL, I like your idea... The folks in those towns/cities get their wish and what they vote for.

Comment_arrow

Brian

8:46 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

couldn't agree more (I sense a trend for the Cape/Islands and Pioneer Valley/Berkshires)

AnnieOMalden

12:48 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Malden already has built the perfect site: across from the DPW is a two building with drive-thrus location! It is not rented yet and one building could sell the weed and the other could sell the snacks! Out of the residential area and off by itself...what could be better? We wouldn't have to be taxed to death by bags and parking stickers...way better than those food trucks who take up parking spots to get into City Hall or pickup T riders.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Erik Royds

11:42 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Annie, I don't think we've ever agreed before but that is a brilliant idea. I kept trying to think of something to go in that dual drive-thru.

Warren Dew

1:08 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

You need a different copy of this article for each town.

Reply

paul surette

1:22 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

"Do you want a medical-marijuana dispensary in Malden?" ...lol then you put a picture of a liquor store in the header? How juvenile...Patch has stooped to a new low! Congrats!

Reply
Comment_arrow

MB

2:28 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Paul, it's a picture of a medical marijuana facility NEXT to a liquor store. Odd juxtaposition yes, accurate photo, also yes.

Elaine Mitrano

1:26 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

LOS ANGELES — One year after federal law enforcement officials began cracking down on California’s medical marijuana industry with a series of high-profile arrests around the state, they finally moved into Los Angeles last month, giving 71 dispensaries until Tuesday to shut down.

Reply

Linda

4:24 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

We finally have a purpose for Kevin's Farm.

Reply

AHM

8:05 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Maybe the old Star on Broadway. All the bales should fit in there.

Reply

troia

10:29 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

The question should be... Would you rather have a Meth clinic in your town or one of these ??

Reply

Rachelle

5:16 am on Saturday, November 10, 2012

In this day & age, medicine has come so far...there are plenty of other pain relief medications.
Now we will have people driving a deadly weapon as they would be high & in an alternated state of consciousness - the words " drive defensively" take on a more serious tone.. perhaps deadly. At minimal, scary.
Those of us with children & healthy, bright minds do not need more temptation & accessibility to a mind- altering substance while they're brains are developing & it would no doubt impair their judgement & decisions. Its too scary.

Reply
Comment_arrow

paul surette

7:16 am on Saturday, November 10, 2012

Rachelle, why don't you take your argument directly to a terminally-ill cancer patient.....and see how far you get with that! Until you've been there, you have no business denying the people who have a legitimate need for it, PERIOD! And if you're so worried about your' developing minds' then do your job as a parent and watch your kids. Statistics show that parents who are fully involved don't have children with addictions....THAT'S FACT!

Comment_arrow

Bobby James

10:36 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

What about the people driving around all doped out on Oxys, Vicodin, Percs, etc that were all legally prescribed to them by doctors. Opioids, that by definition, are far more addictive and abused by people?

Or for the people with nausea problems - gastro-intestinal medication becomes something that the body becomes accustomed to and will regress functionality on account of them. YAY! Another lifelong customer for the pharmaceutical industry!!!

SMH

Comment_arrow

Alison

1:41 pm on Saturday, November 24, 2012

A lot of times pain meds are minimally effective. They also come with a laundry list of serious side effects, for some addiction is included as is impairment. These people may also me out on the road. Not to mention I would be far more concerned about the people driving under the influence of alcohol. Which happens often. I have come across people who do that regularly. I also find it so interesting that people with children are so concerned about marijuana but someday down the line will likely have a drink with their children when they are adults. Alcohol is far more addictive and far more damaging to your health.

Goldstein

6:36 am on Saturday, November 10, 2012

This medicine is widely available and used at Westford Academy, everyone knows what dumpster to toke up near

Reply

paul surette

7:17 am on Saturday, November 10, 2012

Goldstein, how many times a week do you throw your trash in THAT dumpster? :>)

Reply

Jenn-D

7:53 am on Saturday, November 10, 2012

Marijuana is already in our neighborhoods and it hasn't yet caused Somerville to go to Hell in a hand basket, so having a legal, public, safe, place to buy & sell it, seems a lot better to me than in the back of a dark, empty parking lot, like the old Star Market in Winter Hill, let's say...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Margo

3:27 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

This bill was about MEDICAL and Marijuana is still a federally illegal drug. Look at the California and Colorado and you tell me if it is safe.

As DOJ has said on many occasions, Congress has determined through the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) that marijuana is a Schedule I drug and as such growing, distributing, and possessing marijuana in any capacity save a federal research program is in “violation of federal law regardless of state laws permitting such activities” (U.S. DOJ, U.S. Attorneys Durkan and Ormsby, April 14, 2011). DOJ has further stated that “this core priority [of disrupting drug trafficking organizations] includes prosecution of business enterprises that unlawfully market and sell marijuana”(U.S. DOJ, U.S. Attorneys Durkan and Ormsby, April 14, 2011).

Tim

8:09 am on Saturday, November 10, 2012

Arlington already has a couple of places. There already is a methadone clinic . Why not just pass out pot there ?

Reply

Sparket Schmooz

10:16 am on Saturday, November 10, 2012

first off we are the 18th state to legalize medical cannabis. second Quincy is looking into zoning in an industrial area, not keeping out of there municipality. I voted yes on this question for my sister who has suffered from seizures her whole life, 50 years of pharma isn't helping. This god given medicine can help in alot of aliments. If there is a dispensary being planned, please carry a high CBD extract for my sister. Can medicinal cannabis help you check out 686 pages of information http://www.letfreedomgrow.com/cmu/GrannysListJan2012.pdf She updates all the studies every year. There are also educational videos check out "Clearing the Smoke: The Science of Cannabis" or "In Pot we Trust" available with a search. Don't let ignorance cloud your closed mind, this is what we voted for.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Margo

3:29 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Medical Marijuana by the bill is not for seizures. When you have a peer reviewed article please tell me Sparket. Please dont put bogus websites on here. This is what some people voted for.

As DOJ has said on many occasions, Congress has determined through the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) that marijuana is a Schedule I drug and as such growing, distributing, and possessing marijuana in any capacity save a federal research program is in “violation of federal law regardless of state laws permitting such activities” (U.S. DOJ, U.S. Attorneys Durkan and Ormsby, April 14, 2011). DOJ has further stated that “this core priority [of disrupting drug trafficking organizations] includes prosecution of business enterprises that unlawfully market and sell marijuana”(U.S. DOJ, U.S. Attorneys Durkan and Ormsby, April 14, 2011).

Comment_arrow

Sparket Schmooz

4:56 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012

Margo the link 'Granny Storms Crows list' has studies listed by aliment.. see epilepsy/seizures. The bill is for any debilitating condition a doctor would recommend cannabis for, see www.mass.gov for full text. This is a states rights issue, since your more into federal laws maybe you could explain US Patent # 6630507 titled "Cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants", by the US government.

Reading thru the comments i just wanted to mention that smoking cannabis isn't the most beneficial way of obtaining the medicine. There are several ways besides smoking like vaporizing, using the oil extracts, food products.... Here is a video of a couple of doctors explaining the benefits of juicing...The Power of RAW Cannabis http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qgEP9FdIzT8

quasimodo

10:00 am on Sunday, November 11, 2012

Definitely in Winchester, that way I don't have to drive to Boston all the time.

Reply

Raj

4:16 pm on Sunday, November 11, 2012

(Tongue firmly inserted in cheek) How about at the old Malden Hospital site? But seriously, pot and just about anything else is readily available at any one of the various "Roach" Motels on Broadway/Rte. 99 already.

Reply

Donald Mei

11:00 am on Monday, November 12, 2012

I wonder how many chronic pain sufferers could avoid the addiction that often happens with long term use of opioids like oxycocone.

Fewer addicts = less crime.

Reply

Melissa Romiza

2:14 pm on Monday, November 12, 2012

cape cod needs a dispensary. That would make it convient for people on marthas vineyard and nantucket to get to a dispensary as well as residents of cape cod

Reply

Margo

3:19 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

As DOJ has said on many occasions, Congress has determined through the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) that marijuana is a Schedule I drug and as such growing, distributing, and possessing marijuana in any capacity save a federal research program is in “violation of federal law regardless of state laws permitting such activities” (U.S. DOJ, U.S. Attorneys Durkan and Ormsby, April 14, 2011). DOJ has further stated that “this core priority [of disrupting drug trafficking organizations] includes prosecution of business enterprises that unlawfully market and sell marijuana”(U.S. DOJ, U.S. Attorneys Durkan and Ormsby, April 14, 2011).

Reply

Karl Ian Sagal

11:38 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Interesting string of comments. I am a fiscally conservative fellow who believes in small government, but am pretty much a social libertarian. I see very little difference in the various intoxicants. Is Pot (which I do not smoke) really that different from Booze? (which I do infrequently sample)

Someone said this was a good idea if government managed it well. I got news, government doesn't manage anything well. Others have said it is okay, but not in my back yard. Well, pretty much everywhere is in someone's back yard.

There are lots of emotional comments on the medical need for this drug. While it does have some benefit, it also has some near equal costs.

I wonder about all those who rail against people smoking cigarettes, which are banned in restaurants, public parks, most all businesses, and on an on and on... What will happen when these smoke free spaces are confronted with MJ joints? Seems pretty hypocritical to me.

Only the weakest minds (or those under the influence) will think this will only be for medical purposes. It will be abused and used by those without actual medical needs, just as in every other state where this has passed.

One advantage that no one has spoken of yet was the 1000% increase of designer cup cake stores in Cali after pot was legalized by the state. (Yes, it is still a federal crime, but not a state crime)

So, toke it up and buy from the local munchie shop...

Reply

Amy

7:44 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Drugs are easy enough to get anywhere. I do not want it even easier and more visible is the point. I tell my kids say no to drugs, I don't want them to see people going in to buy them. Easy as that. I understand medical purposes but keep it medical. Not a store front!!!

Reply

TomH

8:59 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

The stoners are really weighing in on this issue. Quick reminder - this is supposed to be for MEDICINAL use only, not the teens toking up.

Reply

david mokal

9:06 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Well the majority wants it so tells me that over 50% are potheads. But I want to see them road tested for sobriety to just like DUI's. Now if your working in construction your life will depend on a pot head. Your Pothead Boss will be making desicions on weather you work or not. Police, Fire,EMT's, and polititions will be making decisions for you while there high on pot. But why not put it here in Malden right in the Square they'll blend right in with the rest of the crack heads.

Reply
Comment_arrow

paul surette

5:38 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Sorry Mr. Mokal....but that's a ridiculous remark on your part. It's more like more than the '50%' have some compassion for those who need it medically. That remark of yours tells me you're a senior citizen.

J.longbow

11:15 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Hey Mokal, Malden needs more Suboxone clinics not weed stores. Wouldnt you agree?

Reply

maldenmike

12:00 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

I think if we open some dispensaries, we should open some more restaurants. The food selection sucks, so everyone coming form the dispensaries are going to bring their money elsewhere.

Reply

Kelly O

1:32 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Imagine if people cared about their country as much as they cared about marijuana. Pot heads are a turn off.

Reply

Dave Gray

4:39 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

This ridiculous thread reminds me of the never-ending election threads. To read those, you'd think Romney, Brown, etc, would win in a landslide. Same thing here- you'd never know 2/3 of voters voted IN FAVOR of this. Maybe some day you'll be suffering from chronic, unceasing, never-ending pain and you'll show some compassion for those that do. A 2/3 majority - the biggest I remember in any election in a very long time. Stop whining, get over it, and move on.

Reply
Comment_arrow

paul surette

5:34 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

I agree with you, David Gray.....most of these so-called 'informed' posters have ZERO clue what it's like to be in chronic pain, from the likes of MS and cancer. I bet though, at the first sign of some serious pain, they would be screaming for drugs. To think, these informed people think everyone would wind up 'pot zombies' is just ridiculous. They've been watching way too many After School Specials.

Comment_arrow

Karl Ian Sagal

7:02 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Dave Gray,

Some of us posters do suffer from pain, thanks to injuries I received on active duty in the Army, decades ago.

I happen to think that the government is incapable of managing this with any competency, and that the "medical" portion of this topic is a total sham. It is a sham in every other state that has also legalized "medical" MJ.

I also voted for legalizing it, not because I believe any of these silly arguments, but because I feel adults should be allowed to act as adults, and if they choose to use this intoxicant or that one, it should not be anyone's business, and surely not the governments.

I would rather it was simply treated like booze, and this whole "medical" sham should be dropped.

By the way, I said that I am in pain from my injuries and subsequent surgeries. That does not mean that I smoke pot, nor that I seek drugs to dull the pain. My pain management is not anyone's business, and surely not fodder for this forum.

It was voted in. Lots of stupid things were voted in over the years. This will not be the last, nor the most stupid. I agree, we should move on...

Steve

5:15 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

I vote for vending machines. I am sure the people using them will have a valid prescription.

Reply

Michael Victor

5:18 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Hey Dave I remember 2 thirds voting for the death penalty. But those idiots on the left could care less about that just killed it in the legislature.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dave Gray

6:31 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

You're talking about 1997, right? I don't remember what the popular vote was - was it really 2/3? - but I do remember that the original vote was 81-79 in favor in the House, then some rep from Peabody got squeezed by Felon Finneran and changed his vote, making it 80-80, which by statute means it failed.

Comment_arrow

Karl Ian Sagal

7:10 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Michael,

This is a good topic if you want to see this forum go nuts!

I think we cannot kill people who kill people, and now we cannot let people kill themselves if they want to, but they can kill unborn babies. Interesting.

They cannot smoke cigarettes in more and more places, yet can smoke pot in more and more places. I am looking forward to the smoking bans being enforced after this law about pot takes effect. Will the current bans stand as accurate?

david mokal

8:14 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Actually I would like to see more people get drugged out that way there will be more jobs for the decent people who are straight.

Reply

Mike G.

10:48 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Lots of people here who care way too much about marijuana. I would bet over 75% of you guys have kids who smoke with their friends. I'd bet my salary on it.

I know a great deal of regular, hard-working people who do smoke it, and they are no more addicted to it than they are addicted to drinking. Deal with it folks, this is the new normal.

For various reasons I've never smoked it; but as someone who fits into the "chronic illness that could be debilitating in the future" category, it would be nice to know that this option would be available to me locally someday.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Mark Ouellette

12:12 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012

A comment was deleted for being spam and violating Patch's Terms of Use: www.patch.com/terms

Reply

paul surette

5:30 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012

A good point, Karl! There is a distinct difference between abusing drugs, and pain management.

Reply

david mokal

5:48 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012

Thats true Paul Surette Im a senior citizen what of it. If it is for medical reasons why the bong shops. Why not CVS,Wallgreens and Right Aid. Has no purpose to heal the sick. There are other meds far better. You know dam well it will be abused. But I really dont care. If you want to be a pot head thats your bussiness. Paul Surett you are nobody to tell me how to think.

Reply

paul surette

6:17 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012

Obviously Mr, Mokal, you don't give folks enough credit to make responsible choices for themselves, so you label them all. I know four women who have fibromyalgia. The 'traditional' medications they were prescribed to deal with flareups don't work for them. So, occasionally, they use marijuana to ease the symptoms. Pancreatic cancer patients (I knew two of them) resorted to marijuana when the other 'traditional' meds didn't work for their pain. What these folks would like is to be able to take the crime out of their treatment, given it's THEIR body to begin with! Your thinking is typical of the senior citizen contingent. You enjoy liquor, Mr. Mokal? Nobody's trying to take that away, so why is it wrong for people to partake in their own pleasures, or remedies, at THEIR own expense? Your thinking has an aroma of fossil. Update for you, Mr. Mokal....we no longer use leech's to heal people, nor do we put Vaseline on a burn. Question 2 was no different than the Volstead act, which you were probably around for when it was enacted. The only difference between the two? The Volstead Act was forced upon us. Question 2 GAVE us a choice! I for one, enjoy my freedoms of choice-making. Clearly, you have a penchant for complaining. Enjoy that! :)

Reply
Comment_arrow

david mokal

6:52 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012

SURETTE stick your thoughts where the sun don't shine!

Comment_arrow

Dave Gray

8:53 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012

It's not typical of this senior citizen. Mr. Mokal has his catheter in the wrong orifice. :)

david mokal

6:47 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012

Woooooo, You said I must be a senior citizen. Whats that make me stupid. Seniors dont know better? i HAVE THE RIGHT TO PRINT MY OWN THOUGHTS AS LONG AS I FOLLOW THE RULES. yOU ARE NO ONE to critisize anyone here. Odviously Mr Surette you do not have a clue what your talking about. Also I do not drink nor take drugs. Ive forgotten more than you will ever know and I was around when you were in your ol mans balls

Reply

david mokal

6:49 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012

Mr Surett dont waste your time conversing with me cause Im just going to ignor you. Your just a phoney name on A blog post thats all.

Reply

Cecil Moore

7:56 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012

Mr. Moral,

You certainly take a very aggressive approach in dealing with your detractors. I have found in my 64 years that anyone who has ever said they have forgotten more than anyone has ever know is a person who is insecure in who they are and uncertain in their arguments. Furthermore, anyone that brings up references to anatomical parts of a male body, is certainly referencing his own shortcomings when standing in front of a mirror. I would suggest engaging those who have views other than your own in an intelligent dialogue using a thought process that would indicate that you have intelligence. If you cannot do that, maybe it would be best if you followed the advice of one of our greatest presidents, Abraham Lincoln. He said, "it is better to remain silent and thought a fool...then to speak out and remove all doubt". Take a deep breath and relax, the world is not as bad as you make it out to be. Have a nice night sir.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karl Ian Sagal

10:35 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012

C Moore,

Well said, and well put.

I don't know exactly how this fits in, but I feel I have probably forgotten more than I know now.

Sometimes I envy my own teen age son. I am fairly aware of exactly what I know and do not know. (And no longer know. ;) )

I envy the teenager, because he is so secure in his knowledge that he knows everything. Perhaps one day I will regain that capacity...

Till then, I appreciate those who express themselves, and manage to keep it civil and pithy.

Comment_arrow

david mokal

2:26 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

Not me far from insecure. Im Ol School. I just dont want a piece of crap telling me how I should think. I have never bellyached about anything on these blogs such as I have been accused of. Cecil Im 66 and Ive seen where this goes. Give an inch and they take a foot. Already on 7 news they want to pass it for recreational. I dont drink,don't smoke, and never did drugs. So personally what I said was I dont care what they do everyone can get high it dont matter to me. I also was accused of complaining about everything on this site. Not So never did never will. So Im not the one with the head problem nor do I need to relax cause I dont care what people do.Further more I dont give a crap about what you think either. Im totally relaxed. I enjoy this stupidity on these posts. Cecil whatever your real name is have a great nite.

paul surette

8:46 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012

I hate to disappoint you, Mr. Mokal, but this is my real name. I hide behind nothing for no one :) And to Cecil, you did an excellent job of putting it to Mr. Mokal...and Mr. Mokal, a nurse will be along shortly to change your bed pan :)

Reply
Comment_arrow

david mokal

2:35 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

Paul Surett at least I don't go in my pants like you. Hey this is Turkey week for you and Cecil you'll blend right in cause all you two do is gobble and say nothing. Your very small minded Surette cant speak for yourself so you bring in reinforcments or its most likly yourself talking to yourself.

Karl Ian Sagal

10:29 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012

I have to say, to both Surette and Mokal, that both of you are acting very immaturely. I am no spring chicken, and recall watching the moon landing, but was not old enough to recall where I was when Kennedy was shot...

Still, you both have made some reasonable points, and then make yourselves look silly with the juvenile sniping at each other. If you want people to value and consider your opinions, you need to stop diminishing yourselves with the silly bickering.

I am particularly offended by the jokes about being old, as I choose to respect my elders, but there have been more than enough insults thrown both directions.

I appreciate people debating and expressing their positions. The ad homonym attacks do not add to the debate in my opinion.

Reply
Comment_arrow

fred

10:37 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

karl and Cecil
lighten up. This pot blog has been beaten to death. who cares. I for one enjoy reading Paul and David's bickering post. And let's not leave out old snarky (Diana)
Everyday I click on home and see if Paul/Dave/diana/annie/ and many others that i can maybe get a good laugh from.

paul surette

2:50 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

Tell you what, Karl...I quietly disagreed with Mr. Mogul, and was greeted with something regarding someone's 'balls'. I always say, you get what you give. I have enough speech writers in my life, without getting another speech from YOU. Enjoy your 'debates' on this thread, but save the sermon for church on Sunday :)

Reply
Comment_arrow

david mokal

2:16 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

GOTCHA !! I thought you said you were a heeeeeethan !

paul surette

11:19 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

Paul Surette 2, David Mokal, the old guy, O :)

Reply

paul surette

11:21 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

Says to Fred in his best Georgian drawl..."why Fred, I do declare....you sure know how to flatter a lady....be a good sport and make me a mint julip, please! <batting my eyelashes at you :)

Reply

paul surette

11:26 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

Mr. Mokal....65 years old, and allegedly imparted with all this wisdom in you, and you come back with "Paul Surett at least I don't go in my pants like you."? My son was saying that in 3rd grade. Good grief, man. I was expecting something profound and witty from you, something along the lines of Mark Twain, or William Buckly, but all I got was Romper Room. Damn it, Nurse Ratchet, how did this guy escape?

Reply

Karl Ian Sagal

12:58 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Mr. Surette,

Your gender confusion set aside, I simply asked for a cordial discussion. You choose to make pot shots (excuse the alliteration) at me,

Fred said it well, this thread is not a debate or discussion, it is a joke. You have made it so.

As for your literary reference, many cultures measure the value of a combatant, by the value of his enemy. You have defined Mr. Mokal as yours, and have done a good job to tell us all the value of your enemies. Now, you know that it means that is the value of you as well.

Reply

david mokal

2:12 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Mr Surette, I just read instead of weed to kill pain Coconut Oil has been proven to Nourish the brain. You may want to try it. Also may I add It will kill the loud POP when you pull your head out of your Butt !! Sort of like a silencer. If I ever get terminatley ill Im sure Ill cry out for a bong instead of Morfine.

Reply

david mokal

2:17 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Ok done with this silliness. Ya All Light Up another Fatty now and kill the pain in your brain !

Reply

Karl Ian Sagal

2:21 pm on Saturday, November 24, 2012

I have continued to read about pot heads extolling the virtues of marijuana. 'It is the answer to everyone in pain, it has no side effects, it is not addicting, and much more'...
Total popicock! It is an intoxicant and depressant like many others.
I happen to be a disabled veteran from 30 years ago. I happen to be a politically conservative, social libertarian, and generally a traditionalist. I also voted to legalize pot, because I do not see it as much different than liquor or tobacco. Some will use it responsibly, some not. The government can establish what it feels is reasonable and responsible use, and those who abuse it will face appropriate consequences. (Just like driving drunk, or abusing cigarettes)

Speaking of that, why is it that smoking tobacco is the worst thing on the planet according to some, but smoking marijuana is okay? Entirely because of politics, and silly inconsistent standards, and not for any other reason. Wait till the law gets a hold of the under the influence driving defense of second hand pot smoke. What a boon for the lawyers that one will be.

I have had the opportunity and have occasionally imbibed alcohol since I was about 16 or 17. (Drinking age back in those days was 18). I am not an alcoholic, and I know many others who drink that are not either. It does not mean that alcohol is not addictive. So is pot by the same standard.

I voted for it. Please do not further embarrass me by saying such silly things about it.

Reply

david mokal

2:28 pm on Saturday, November 24, 2012

I wanna see one right in the Middle of Malden Square. Be great. It would bring more people here to come use our fine resturaunts. Great Idea

Reply

paul surette

3:31 pm on Saturday, November 24, 2012

All legitimate points you made, Allison. Watch out, as some here will call you a liar, and say you're just another desperate stoner. I understand the plight people have in trying to manage their pain. A lot of times, as in your example, prescription drugs don't work, as they target the brain differently. and no one has ever committed a violent crime, or want to drive a car.....when folks get high, they dont want to do anything....that is the point of the stuff in the first place. People like Mr. Mokal compare his arthritis to other people' ailments, then offer some solution from something they read on the Saturday Evening Post......40 years ago! Some people are just out of touch.

Reply

robert wilson

3:36 pm on Saturday, November 24, 2012

The perfect spot for a despensary would be next to a Taco Bell, we'd have open one of those also, more tax money.

Reply

SomervilleGirl

7:27 am on Sunday, November 25, 2012

Quincy is worried about marijuana. That is laughable.

Reply

SomervilleGirl

7:46 am on Sunday, November 25, 2012

Some are unhappy because they see it as competition. The biggest and worst drug dealers, who cause majority of harm to patients.are the major drug companies who may get a small dent in their oxy sales and whatever other pain meds they push on people who get hooked. Those drugs are the worst, Oxy, is really synthetic heroin. Why are they allowed to get people hooked on herion? How is this legal? And when their patients are hooked on these nasty drugs, they turn them away instead of trying to help them get well. I once worked with a woman who died of an overdose from oxycodone, leaving two small children and a husband. I heard of another local case where a guy with a severe back problem got hooked and then his doctor never returned his calls. They can't just leave people blowing in the wind, because that is what causes people to break down and some will get desperate. More should be done to help people get off dope and stay off dope, but it takes a great deal of work, money and compassion.

When they prescribe these dangerous drugs, they will sometimes list them with a generic name so you won't know it's oxy. I was prescribed this drug during an ER visit requiring an incision. After taking two of these pills, I called to inquire what they were and when I found out, I tossed them in the trash. Beware of oxy, if your doctor prescribes them, ask for something that is non-addicting. You might be saving your own life.

Reply

David Matson

11:49 am on Sunday, November 25, 2012

This is classic ill-informed. NIMBYism. There is no evidence that there is any crime associated with medical marijuana dispensaries. The people of the Commonwealth supported this measure by a wide margin.
http://www.masscriminaldefense.com/blog/massachusetts-towns-must-accept-medical-marijuana-dispensaries/

Reply
Comment_arrow

david mokal

12:11 pm on Sunday, November 25, 2012

David in Maine the Gahnga Crops are abundant. Kids 12 years old are growing it. Its like a sport up there who can grow the best and the most. Thats what they do to stay out of trouble. Go Cow Tipping and growin their crop.

Comment_arrow

Chris

12:49 pm on Sunday, November 25, 2012

Lets put one next to your house

Leave a comment