Mayor: 'We Should Be Okay' With State Cuts
Mayor Gary Christenson said the city anticipated the reductions and planned accordingly earlier this year.
Muncipalities across the commonwealth are facing potential cuts to local aid Gov. Deval Patrick proposed last week, in anticipation of the "fiscal cliff" combined with projected state tax revenues that are more than $500,000 lower than previously expected.
"The uncertainty of the fiscal cliff and the resulting slow down in growth, is the direct cause of our budget challenges," Patrick said. "Congress and the President must come to terms on a solution so the private sector will continue to make the kind of investments that create jobs, grow state and federal tax revenue collections and contribute to a lasting economic recovery."
Based on Patrick's proposal, four programs stand to be affected by cuts:
- Unrestricted local aid
- Special education circuit breakers
- Transportation cost reimbursment for homeless students
- Charter school reimbursement.
Exact figures will be hammered out by the legislature in the coming weeks. While Patrick can cut executive branch agencies through emergency mid-year '9C' cuts, the Legislature would have to approve expanded '9C' powers for Patrick to cut local aid.
The Legislature won't tackle the governor's proposal until after the New Year, as the body is currently in informal session.
"Our preliminary review is that we should be okay, although we are hoping that local aid will in the end be removed as part of the proposed cuts," Mayor Gary Christenson told Malden Patch via email. "This opinion is partly due to us anticipating these reductions for the past few months and planning accordingly."
"For example, we placed a temporary freeze on some of the vacant positions that have yet to be filled, which will...make it difficult on some of our departments moving forward. We have also been working closely with the City Council most notably Finance Chair Greg Lucey which has helped prepare us for these cuts.
"Obviously, if things change further then we will need to re-evaluate," he concluded.
The Governor's Proposal
In summary, the governor plans to balance the budget with the following reductions:
- $225 million in spending reductions through cuts in Executive Branch agencies. Combined with hiring controls the administration imposed in October, the total state workforce will have more than 6,000 fewer positions at the end of fiscal year 2013 than it did before the recession. A number of new investments for projects and programs in FY13 have been also been reduced or eliminated, including limiting new or restored funding for investments across a range of government services.
- $200 million from the Rainy Day Fund, bringing the total draw to $550 million in FY13 – leaving a balance of $1.2 billion, one of the highest in the country.
- $98 million in additional federal revenues in support of safety net programs operated by the state on behalf low-income residents.
- $25 million from a 1 percent reduction in the budgets of the Judiciary, Constitutional Officers and other non-executive departments.
- $20 million from a total of $113 million in savings in state borrowing and health care reform costs. The remainder of this funding will be used to offset some unavoidable deficiencies which must be funded this fiscal year.
- $20 million from a reduction in the amount of sales tax revenues that will automatically be transferred to the Massachusetts School Building Authority to support local school building costs.
- $11 million from certain reserve fund surpluses.
- $9 million from a 1 percent across-the-board reduction to unrestricted local aid. The governor has filed legislation that ensures if lottery profits exceed the $1.026 billion amount currently budgeted in FY13, all of such excess proceeds be committed to increasing the amount of unrestricted local aid.
dlanod
7:51 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
Yep, all you have to do is raise taxes by about $12 per person and the missed money can be made up.
Kevin
8:28 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
I though if Obama was elected again and Warren was elected all our problems were supposed to go away.
whatsup
10:05 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
No it were not supposed to go away. But they will at least give the middle class a chance to dig out of the holes that the republican policy put them in with their bias for the wealthy and rich.
Income of households in the top 1 percent of earners grew by 275%, compared to 65% for the next 19 percent, just under 40% for the next 60 percent, 18% for the bottom fifth of households. i.e. The millionaires were buying that fifth vacation house while the middle class is struggling to get by.
Carl
12:16 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
When is this supposed to start? How long can they blame others for their failures? I want to see results not hear nonsense.
maldenlifer
12:44 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
to whatsup - if only you had a clue. The top earners are the ones who pay the taxes already. Please do research before you mouth off with no basis. BTW - the Washington Post - who endorsed Obama - is paying all of next years dividends this month to avoid the extra taxes for the shareholders - ha - do as i say not as i do
Raj
12:44 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
I have to laugh (in sickness) when I hear people claim to tax the rich and leave the middle class alone. I have been struggling for years (under both parties) to even remotely achieve "middle class" status. Don't let them fool you thinking the Middle Class won't see tax hikes...Just look at your latest cable, telephone, heating bills and see all the "Fees" the federal government is adding. Obama is also taxing traditional fuels like oil and gasoline along with natural gas to provide funding to "green energy initiatives" which hits us all in our bills. I don't even want to think how much employee contribution to health insurance is going to go up with Obamacare taxes taking hold in January. Prepare for even higher co-pays and prescription drug co-pays too! Even if they come to some backroom deal on the "fiscal cliff" situation, we are all going to pay more and the middle and lower class will feel it the most no matter what anyone says...."fiscal cliff??? My situation, and that of may lower and middle class has already gone more like the way of New Hampshires "Old Man of the Mountain...
As to the mayor's comment ..."Malden being okay with state cuts"....watch out....those funds are coming from somewhere sure as there is trash blowing around the blue bags on trash day!
AnnieOMalden
1:05 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Carl: If all politics is local, have you seen a Council meeting?
david mokal
1:51 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
I did last night Annie O. Another Yesem ! Its ok. You'll do better with the trash. The family of the Trash Cartel has been here in Malden all their lives. That gives them the green light for a 20 yr contract. Oh Garmache gonna beat up his workers with these complaints. Yes it will all be better. What a ZOO PARADE !
paul surette
7:21 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
This is what kills me about people like 'whatsup'. It seems most like 'whatsup' do nothing but try and beat down wealthy people. Did it ever occur to you that wealthy people ACTUALLY EARNED their wealth? Let's put a cap on earnings....just don't you dare try doing it to me. Just ridiculous. People, all too often, condemn others for what they have, rather than spending their energy and try and EARN something themselves! Sickening to say the least!
AnnieOMalden
8:28 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Paul: I don't think people mind how much money someone else makes, I believe the problem is when those who make huge fortunes use loopholes to pay less than they should. Wasn't it Leona Helmsley who said "only the little people pay taxes"?
paul surette
9:06 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Guess what Annie? Middle class folks use tax loopholes as well! And some cheat on their taxes, so I don't see the difference there other than one's total income.
AnnieOMalden
9:20 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Oh, Paul, I think you know what I mean. You aren't that thick are you? How many loopholes do the middle class folks have access to that those with huge fortunes routinely use? Or businesses?