Mayor, State Officials Seek Expansion of State Wiretap Law
Mayor Gary Christenson and other political and law enforcement leaders called for an expansion of state wiretapping law Monday, allowing the surveillance of cell phones and more. What do you think - is this a good idea?
Mayor Gary Christenson joined other political and law enforcement officials at a Boston press conference Monday, announcing their new push for the first update to the state's wiretapping laws since 1968.
Passed before the development of cell phones, language in the state's current law restricts wiretaps to only “wire communications,” and limits the use of such surveillance to organized crime investigations.
“We are not giving law enforcement the tools they need to fight back,” State Sen. Clark told reporters.
With the support of State Attorney General Martha Coakley, Clark has introduced a new bill offering three major revisions to existing law:
1. Updates the definition of “wire communication” to include wireless devices like cell phones and pagers,
2. Removes the organized crime requirement for offenses and would allow wiretaps in the investigation of other crimes, such as rape, human trafficking, money laundering, and enterprise crime.
3. Extends the possible term of a wiretap from 15 days to 30 days.
All wiretaps would still require probable cause and judicial review, Coakley said.
Christenson told reporters that crime had been Malden's “ most dominant issue” during his first year in office, with 10 shootings in 2012 alone.
“We need help,” he told reporters. “That's why im here to thank the attorney general and Sen. Clark - they get it, and they know what we're up against."
david mokal
11:27 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
You bet it is. Go for it.
paul surette
2:08 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Get a warrant, plain & simple!
Chris Caesar
2:10 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Paul, to be clear, you'd still need to get a warrant from a judge, etc. like you would for any traditional wiretap under current law. This would simply expand the scope of crimes for which you could obtain a wiretap, as well as the technologies that can be surveilled.
paul surette
2:10 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
This is what kills me. How does 'Gary' or Coakley, for that fact, think a wiretap is going to stop a shooting? It's just a ridiculous notion!
jimbo
2:12 am on Wednesday, January 30, 2013
I could help out with some stuff
Ann
2:10 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Its wireless comunications they want to be able to tap, They want to be Hackers. Big G, wants all of our privacy!
jirkyrick
8:04 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013
e if they suspect the gangs in the city for a lot of the crime, they can tap their cellphones. It's time to upgrade the laws to modern communication methods to give the cops more tools
Joseph Hillstrom
8:31 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013
I'm reminded of George Carlin's joke about a congressman staffer who knew his phone line was tapped and always answered the phone with F*** Hoover! Government overreaching which has no hope of preventing crime, a perfect fit.