Have You Reviewed with Your Children What to Do in 'Danger' Scenarios? Should You?
A week after the Newtown, CT, massacre, schools have reviewed their safety procedures. Now should parents follow up with more coaching?
A week after the deadly elementary school attack in Newtown, CT, that has rocked the the nation, some parents say their kids remain oblivious to the attack—and the danger.
Most teens and children are wrapped up in their own worlds. One mom of a middle-schooler told me instead of being worried about how the Newtown deaths would affect her daughter, she is more concerned that the girl is not aware enough of what took place.
And there is only so much the schools can do.
So this mom will spin out a scenario of danger and ask the daughter to think through how she might best respond.
If you are a parent, are you doing the same kind of 'coaching' with your kids? Should parents be following up and expanding on the schools' safety procedures and lockdown drills? Or could that only cause more confusion for a kid about what to do in danger? Tell us in the comments section below.
Resident
12:52 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
As a father of two girls and a teacher I take personal safety very seriously. I teach my children life lessons daily. Be it respect, common courtesy, personal safety… If you focus proper decision making skills they will know what to do if a situation arises.
M. Meyers
1:27 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
As a parent and military member, my thoughts are this...absolutely the schools schould train and practice their procedures for an shooter. This should be routine, almost as routine as a fire drill. Realistically these practices should take place in our place of work too. WIth regards to the parents enforcing this, I believe the parents should also receive training from the school. This way they can enforce those same practices with their children at home and the kids are getting a reinforced consistent message without confusion as to what to do in that sort of scenario. Most law enforcement departments can provide training to teachers and school leadership. Let's hope no one will ever have to experience such a tragedy again.
Mark
1:49 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
"schools have reviewed their safety procedures" This is a pretty broad statement. The only things schools teach your kids is how to be a victim. We have the God given Unalienable Right to protect ourselves and our loved ones.
Parents need to know as much as they can about their teachers and what they are teaching their kids.
The ultimate responsibility and God given right to protect and defend your kids lies with the parent. Relinquish your responsibility at your own risk.
If you think the Gov or any one of their many agencies can protect them or you..... you are crazy!
Mike
2:12 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
Last I checked, the schools were teaching my kids reading and math skills, with some science and basic civics for good measure.
...and speaking of civics, I sincerely wish that my dear, dear friends on the right would stop misusing the term unalienable rights.
Mark
2:06 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
Wakefield Police Chief Richard Smith told Fox 25 in Boston this week that of the 17 Level 1 sex offenders in Wakefield, 16 committed their crimes against children. How many are in Stoneham? How many are working or living around your schools, church's, playgrounds, etc? YOU don't know! Why?
Because our feckless legislators on Beacon Hill are more intent on protecting the rights of sex offenders over the rights of our own children.
Do you honestly think they have the spine to protect you from crazies with the intent on murdering the most innocent amongst us?
Do you honestly think the crazies are going to abide by any feel good legislation passed by those fools on Beacon Hill?
You have the right and responsibility to carry whatever weapon necessary to protect you and your loved ones from anyone intent on doing you or them harm.
Mike
2:16 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
"You have the right and responsibility to carry whatever weapon necessary to protect you and your loved ones from anyone intent on doing you or them harm."
My local dealer was fresh out of Bradley Fighting Vehicles but said he could put me in a loaded low-mileage tank for zero money down.
Daniel DeMaina
2:19 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
The topic is reviewing dangerous situations with your children. What would you do, Mark?
Tim
5:22 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
mark is in such a panic he would shoot-em up first and ask questions later. He sounds like he need some help, much like adam lanza did.
Steevo
2:32 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
I vaguely remember my older brother's early Heath Brook years being told to get under his desk in the event of the dreaded a-bomb. I don't know what a school can realistically say to kids when there is no way to actually defend themselves and the shooter knows this. Don't know what parents can say either other than tell them it is still a highly unusual event that should not distract their attention and confidence.
david mokal
5:36 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
@ Steevo your absoluly correct. They used to give us a shhet of construction paper to kneel on and get under our desks. Sometimes a Sirene would go off and you slipped under the desk as fast as you can. Thats why alot oif we seniors are Drain Bramaged because you would smash the front lobel of your brain on the desk getting under. Now Old way can be a new way. Install a sheet of Lexan where you can easily pull it out from under the desk so at least you have something to hold in front of you. You can also install a lexan in your childs back pack as well. Better than nothin and bullet proof as well.
paul surette
9:49 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012
Steevo, when you say Heath Brook, I take it you're talking about the Tewksbury school?
Steevo
8:14 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Yes Paul back in the very early 60s, with grades 1st through 6th.
Tyler Jozefowicz
6:43 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
So the answer to the proliferation of Bushmaster AR-15, military style M-16's with 30 odd clips is to carry a police whistle? Anyone agree with that? My answer is to get rid of the Bushmaster AR-15's and all similar semi-automatic weapons so you don't need the police whistles. Outlaw them and confiscate them just like you do illegal drugs. Problem solved. Police whistles!
Tim
6:54 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
NO the NRA says the answer to too many gun is MORE GUNS. If we kill everyone, there won't be anyone left to try to get us.
Iron Mike
7:05 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
Well Tyler, since you seem to have the standard liberal answer 'get rid of the Bushmasters'...please tell us HOW you would do that...
- would you arrest people who refused to give up their guns? How would you know WHO to arrest?
- would you have police RAID the HOMES of suspects, - or just do a block-by-block search of the entire nation?
- Since 'outlawing' illegal drugs has done SO MUCH to end THAT PROBLEM,...explain how it will work for the particular guns you want to outlaw. [BTW - have you ever smoked marijuana, - or do you know someone who has...?]
Yes, police whistles - very fast - no fumbling - quick way to alert the entire school to close and deadbolt their classroom doors - thus minimizing carnage.
- - - - - - - - - -
Your scoffing tone reveals a background lived in utter safety - where you've never been shot at or been in fear for your life. Thus you sound both arrogant and foolish. Try to listen to your more experienced elders. You ~ might ~ learn something.
Tim
7:27 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
yes mike, since there are so many guns, the only reasonable answer is MORE GUNS.
By the way, how many times have you been shot at in chelmsford? And the last time someone did shoot at you, how many gun hoarding kooks were there in chelmsford.
Randy Winslow
11:47 am on Saturday, December 22, 2012
Jon, you didn't answer mikes question.
david mokal
9:36 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012
I agree and a can of mace is no way going to take out a gunman either. You would have a better chance whizzin on him. Take away all assault rifles no need for them.
TK
3:52 pm on Monday, December 24, 2012
I will answer Mike:
1) will ban the resale of existing guns, and limit number/type of guns people can own + push "safe gun" technology (auto industry survived it), and in 2 generations number of guns will drop significantly.
2) same as 1st;
3) this one is an easy one: will make drugs available everywhere, even give them free at school - it will surely fix the drugs problem!
Overall - Mike (similar to all gun community) seemed to be overwhelmed with the issue, does not know where to start etc. My advice is to relax and do not touch anything - we will take of it. Because you surely can not.
Donald Mei
8:26 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
Tyler, do you know that the AR15 is the best selling rifle in the US and has been for the last 10 years. Its used for protection, target shooting and hunting. The M16 is one thing and the AR is another. The M16 is automatic. You pull the trigger and it keeps firing until it is empty as long as the trigger is held back. The AR15 fires once per trigger pull. Just like grandpas duck gun or dad's deer rifle. The same as every handgun ever made other than the single action revolver. Its not a big deal.
Tim
9:25 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
donald, the AR15 is the M-16. Did you know that you can modify the sear pin in the AR15 to turn it into an M-16. It's the same weapon.
Donald Mei
11:05 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
John,
You can't "modify the sear pin". First, there is no such thing as a sear pin. Second, when the AR15 mechanism was designed it was designed explicitly to make it difficult to convert full auto. Second, converting a semi-auto gun to full auto is illegal. Third, you clearly know nothing about firearms. Fourth, the AR15 is not the M16. Different fire control parts and a different receiver make it a different gun with very different capabilities.
Olivia R.
11:30 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
I can't get over the utter lack of common sense today. Yesterday two school buses carrying 4 and 5 year olds in (I think) Haverhill were shot at by supposedly a BB gun or pellet gun. Well, they decided to put some buses out there "empty..with no children in them", in hopes of someone taking a shot at one. Would someone please explain to me if you can, why the media put this information about the empty school buses on news???? Why advertise it!!!!! Stupidity and ignorance at its best!!! It is astounding how much of a lack of common sense there is today. Sad, really!
Iron Mike
8:05 am on Saturday, December 22, 2012
You are correct Olivia. The 'Press' long ago gave up any semblance of common sense or patriotism. They will gleefully publish national defense secrets, addresses of protected witnesses, and inner details of crimes being investigated.
Do you remember when they lined the beaches of Mogadishu to watch the Marines land – and to film any Marines being killed?
If the 'Press' has any scruples, they would have helped vet Obama in 2008. Instead they signed on as campaign staffers.
paul surette
10:22 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012
Because we NEED to know, Olivia....LOL
Hey, Mr . Criminal, just want to let you know we will be there to arrest you at 5PM :)
melee
9:02 am on Saturday, December 22, 2012
To the original question I have long told my child that if he sees a gun in school that he must immediately run and tell a person of authority. I have always expected such person to be a student ala Columbine. I have never expected someone off the street to ambush a school. So now I say in an ambush scenario, follow instructions if given, hide and play dead if necessary.
And while removing assault weapons off the street is difficult it does not mean that it should not be done. We implement legislation and use laws and regulations to enforce them. The belief that there are good guys who have guns and bad guys with gun is a flawed narcissistic view of humanity. We are all capable of acts of deviance. I am more concerned about being hurt by a "responsible" gun owner than I am by the stranger boogie man.
Donald Mei
9:44 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Melee - do you know what an "assault weapon" is? Seriously. Do you know what differentiates it from, lets say, the most commonly used target gun in the country?
Here is the problem. These firearms shoot no faster than any other firearm. (one shot for each squeeze of the trigger) They are no faster to reload than any other gun that takes a detachable magazine.
This is 100 year old technology. Its never been a problem.
The murder rate in the US has fallen 48% since 1994!! At a time when more people than ever have carry permits. Do you legislate on emotion? Or do you legislate on empirical data?
Donald Mei
9:47 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
I have to apologize melee. My previous post contained a trick question. You see, the AR15, the "assault weapon" used by that horrible murderer in Newtown is ALSO the most popular target gun in the country. No joke.
This is not a fringe type of firearm. The AR15 has been the best selling firearm in the country for the last 5 years. It is used literally tens of thousands of times each day, all across the country in marksmanship matches. Google "Camp Perry Matches". You might learn something.
Ron Powell
11:02 am on Saturday, December 22, 2012
The reality is that there are no steps that we can take to prevent a mass shooting. If someone wants a gun badly enough, he or she will obtain it whether it is legal or illegal, banned or not banned. You can buy a handgun illegally on the black market for $300 to $500, and this is an illegal market that law enforcement already knows about.
The truth is that mass shootings happen so rarely (you are 50 percent more likely to be be killed by lightning, for example, than to die from a mass shooting) that it is simply not honest to say that we can predict where, when, and how one will occur. It should be noted that the TSA has never thwarted an actual terrorist attack, although it is true that its mere presence may discourage would-be terrorists from attacking.
There are, however, steps that we can take to reduce the risk of a mass shooting, and the most important of these would be to ban high capacity magazines. Connecticut has one of the strictest gun laws on the books, and one of the most exhaustive lists of banned "assault weapons" but it does not restrict magazine capacity, and that is what made the weapon that Adam Lanza used so lethal.
Randy Winslow
11:50 am on Saturday, December 22, 2012
So Connecticut having stricter guns laws didn't matter? Hmmm, I wonder why this didn't happen in Texas? Less mental illnesses there? I guess no assumptions can be made.
Iron Mike
12:00 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012
Ron, with all respect, - you're looking for 'easy answers' – where there are none.
- Some want to outlaw all guns – but there is no way Americans will ever surrender 270 million guns.
- Some want to outlaw 'certain' guns – often called 'Assault Rifles'... but there are MILLIONS of them out there – and our government can't even round up 11 million illegals – or stop the flow of drugs across our southern border.
- Some want to outlaw 'hi-capacity magazines' – but again – there are ALREADY MILLIONS of them out there. It wasn't 30-round mags that made Lanza lethal – it was his defective brain. And nobody able to shoot back...
So,...understanding that the wackos ALWAYS pick on places with a lot of HELPLESS unarmed targets – schools, churches, malls, theaters – let's get smart.
We need armed guards [don't need to be cops] guarding our schools – our malls, our theaters, churches, and sports events. We need to encourage honest, stable citizens to be armed. Being able to shoot back is the best defense – trust me on that!
AND – we need to get serious about locking up the psychos walking free among us.
paul surette
10:18 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012
Correct on all points, Ron!
Donald Mei
9:56 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Ron, it takes about 2 seconds to reload an AR15. Not hard to do when everyone around you is cowering.
I'll be honest. I'm very pro-gun rights, but you sound reasonable, so I'll present a reasonable argument, that I'd appreciate it if you would rebut.
1) the only way to remove some of the One billion magazines currently owned by civilians would be to first outlaw all those in posession. Not merely outlaw all future sales, but outlaw all private ownership. This would make felons out of millions of people who would fail to destroy or sell their magazines. If you merely outlawed them, then the criminals would, by definition, not turn them in. So once again, you disarm only the honest people. If you really wanted to effectively remove these magazines from american society, youwould have to go door to door searching houses. In clear violation of the 4th and 5th Amendment. This would probably trigger some kind of civil war, or at least a semi-organized civil uprising. (Remember, BHO ran for president saying "I'm not going to take your guns".
Donald Mei
9:56 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
(continued)
2) if you take other route and simply ban all future sales (which MA has already done) you still have over a billion of these magazines in the hands of the American public. i.e. it will be pointless.
So whats the point? You ban future sales and all you is do inconvenience honest people, while criminals will gladly pay the inflated prices for the larger mags.
You can't go house to house and collect them.
So, if the Govt wishes to act within the constitution, there is nothing they can do to remove these magazines or any weapons for that matter, from the hands of criminals. The only ones you disarm are the honest people.
I don't know about you, but I trust my neighbors more than I trust my Government. But then again, that may be the root of our disagreement.
Noelle
11:32 am on Saturday, December 22, 2012
If anyone out there wants some actual help with talking about scary situations like this with children, here are a couple of links to some great resources.
PBS has an Arthur story with suggestions and tips for the parents: http://www.pbs.org/parents/arthur/resources/parentguides/safe.index.html?cat=index.en
and the American Academy of Pediatrics also has a great bunch of resources:
http://www.healthychildren.org/English/news/Pages/AAP-Offers-Resources-to-Help-Parents,-Children-and-Others-Cope-in-the-Aftermath-of-School-Shootings.aspx?nfstatus=401&nftoken=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000&nfstatusdescription=ERROR%3a+No+local+token&nfstatus=401&nftoken=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000&nfstatusdescription=ERROR%3a+No+local+token
paul surette
10:17 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012
I'm sorry, Noelle.... a cartoon? Really? I think someone has been watching WAAAAAY too much public television!
TB
1:01 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012
The only solution to a "bad guy" with a gun, is a "good guy" with a gun. Switzerland was able to stay neutral during world war two despite being surrounded by evil, because every male citizen was armed. And, no I am not saying that every male citizen should be armed here. If you go back and look at the first assault rifle banned back in 94. What happened? Oklahoma City bombing did. And,no guns were used in that evil act. I think that as a society, we have to look at the epidemic of over medication of our children. It seems like more of our children are being prescribed these heavy drugs for ocd, adhd, hyper activity. etc...and no one knows what the long term affects these medicines have on humans. So for me personally, I honestly think we have to look for answers elsewhere other then banning guns. I mean look at how good the laws on illegal drugs are helping our society.
quasimodo
1:15 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012
As during WWI, Switzerland, remained neutral during WWII, not because "every male citizen was armed, but because it was "convenient" for both the Allies and the Third Reich. The citizens of the other European countries got hold of weapons in a very short time, but could not stand up to the Blitzkrieg. The German could have done the same thing with Switzerland as they did with Poland, France, etc., had they wished to. You'd better start planing a short trip at your local library, and read about Switzerland, especially during these last two wars.
paul surette
10:15 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012
Excellent points, TB. Hitler eliminated over 6 million Jews, but he didn't do most of it with guns, that's been proven. ANYONE motivated enough to commit mass killings is going to find a way! Disarming Americans isn't going to solve the violence in America, period!
TB
1:24 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012
Well, If Hitler could have done the same with Switzerland, then why didn't he? I mean he was a mad man and wanted to control all of Europe. I mean did he ju ost say,of the Swiss make great Choclate, lets leave them alone? I visit my local library quite often, maybe next trip you may want to join.
Iron Mike
2:04 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012
Aah poor Quasi... Clearly he slept through History and Geography.
Quasi, let me give you a hint... Switzerland is a mountainous country – with very few access points [called mountain passes] for an army to advance. The defenders – all armed – have the advantage of shooting DOWN on the advancing hordes.
Likewise the Japanese never planned to invade the mainland USA – because Admiral Yamamoto – having gone to school at Harvard – said 'there would be a rifle behind every blade of grass'.
Do some research Quasi – see how they keep Israeli schools safe – see what their teachers carry/wear... Over there the madmen pray to Mecca 5 times a day.
Aron Levy
10:15 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012
The reason Japan never invaded the continental US was because they had NO NEED to. Perhaps you've heard of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere? It did not include the United States.
(Mind you, they did invade Kiska and Attu in Alaska. But I wouldn't expect someone who believes the 'rifle behind ever blade of grass' canard to actually know that.
Iron Mike
2:15 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012
To: bindersfull ohwomen
>> ... how are we gonna lock up all the psychos
There are 270 million guns – 80 million Americans own them. The manpower and money do not exist to force their surrender...
There are FAR FEWER psychos – and they move through a filtering system – called our schools.
By the time a kid reaches 6th grade he/she is showing signs – and can be identified, helped, - and if necessary isolated. By the time they're sophomores – if they are adjudged as 'psycho' – then they can be committed. Think Klebold and Harris....
Be alert to kids who deliberately estrange and isolate themselves.
paul surette
10:12 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012
An excellent point, Mike....those two knuckleheads in Columbine were known to be 'loners' When the Feds got into one of the kid's homes, which was owned by the grandfather, there were TELL TALE signs of this kid being disturbed, Anyone gonna try and say the grandfather didn't know what was going on?
Tyler Jozefowicz
4:57 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012
Mike: to answer your question about the Bushmasters:
1. stop selling clips to the semi-automatic rifles and other assault weapons; no clips , the weapons are useless
2. ban the future sale of automatic assault weapons with federal legislation so it applies to all 50 states; you don't have to worry about waiting periods, registrations, felons,mentally ill if they are banned.
3. prevent the sale of automatic weapons at gun shows, gun shops and over the internet;
4. $$$ for voluntary turning in of semi-automatic weapons; after the school massacre in Scotland, 172,000 weapons were turned in.
5. drop a dime on those that possess
6. where there are records of sales , have the local police make a house call.
It's a gradual process, but better than doing nothing. People WITH guns kill people. Your answer is more guns, so we'll never agree. Let the legislatures vote and decide. That is how we handle things in a democracy.
Iron Mike
5:18 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012
Do you even KNOW the difference between a 'clip' and a magazine?
For every so-called 'assault rifle' out there there are between 5 and 15 magazines...
Most of the spree killers in recent years acquired their weapons legally - and within just days or weeks of thir act. BUT - they were known to be crazy months or YEARS in advance.
Did you ever research Michael 'Mucko' McDermott?
Do you believe the Death Penalty is a deterrent?
You never answered the core question – would you arrest and/or gun down people who refused to surrender their arms? If so, what makes you any different from George III?
Iron Mike
5:20 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012
You don't live in a 'democracy', you live in a Republic. Try to understand the difference.
Mike
7:10 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012
Tyler, as much as I love mocking the NRA gun nuts, they have a point about the general public's ignorance about weapons. To debate the issue it helps to have some knowledge, or better yet, some experience with the weapons in question.
Clips haven't been widely used since the M1 Garand went out of service in the 1960s, a rifle replaced by the M14 and its box magazine. Modern semi-auto rifles and carbines use magazines; this is the correct term.
There are many multiples of magazines available for each rifle in circulation, so a ban would be futile.
Banning future sales of automatic weapons might work, but these have already been heavily regulated since the mid 1930s. I think you meant semi-automatic weapons.
I could see a buyback and ban on future sales or semiautomatic weapons working, but you'd find very little traction among current gun owners. Some would keep their weapons on principle. That's why they're flying off the shelves now.
I'm completely and totally on board with a gun show ban. Gun shows are borderline criminal enterprises meant primarily to avoid proper background checks.
Mike
7:23 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012
Tyler, your last two points are troublesome for lots of reasons. What you're proposing is a 180-degree change from fairly lax gun ownership rules to a police state charged with monitoring and/or confiscating guns. This is not a gradual process. In fact, this was tried once here and it failed horribly for England.
About 40 percent of US household own at least one gun. About 20-25 percent own multiple weapons.
Jason
9:37 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012
Tyler the question posed above is about safety and how to speak with your children about very horrible events.
Where did it ask about the steps that are necessary to become a police state?
paul surette
10:09 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012
Um, Tyler....if you expect the police to make a 'house call'.make sure they have a WARRANT first :)
Iron Mike
8:17 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012
Except for that unnecessary slur about 'NRA gun nuts' Mike, - I compliment your patience dealing with young Tyler.
Be careful though, - he ~ sounds ~ pretty dogmatic in his opinions. Now with multiples of us pushing back and poking holes,...he may feel unloved and cornered. He may become desperate,...and buy a gun...
And as you so correctly pointed out, some of his views are very troubling already.
Tyler Jozefowicz
11:01 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012
Mikie: the troubling views are coming from the NRA. The NRA solution to gun violence is more guns. I don't think so. And BTW a Republic is a monarch. A Republican form of govt protects the minority, but we still have votes where the majority rules last time I checked. If the legislature goes over board, the judiciary is there to interprete, and rule on unconstitutional legislation. Checks and balances , Mikie.
Paul: the police will have search warrants based upon reasonable suspicion to answer your skeptical question.
Jason: I was answering Mikie's question ; Mikie went far afield. Notice you didn't pick Mikie up on it. And Jason, you are concerned about safety? Do something about the guns. the guns, Jason. I know you love your kids.
Jason
9:30 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012
As a father of two and husband of a wondeful wife, safety and personal awareness are always at the fore front of my day to day life. Be it walking around the block, or shopping at the Basket'.
As a sportsman, it's personal resposibilty that is at the fore front.
An adult that is engaged in a childs world makes a mountain of difference.
Iron Mike
11:10 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012
To: 'david mokal'
You are CLEARLY confused calling ME a 'moonbat'. Guess you haven't been on my blog.
- Violent video games and porn star teachers = NO!
- Patriot Act has some over-reaching parts.
- 'GEEZER GAURDS' = please use your spellchecker.
My point is that we employ retired folks as school crossing guards – they do a fine job. In a similar manner we can hire retired cops and military [folks with decades of documented training] as armed school guards.
- Don't YOU worry about who can beat the crap out of me....
Strongly suggest you think and proofread before you post again. It would help if you have something constructive to add to the discussion.
paul surette
10:05 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012
Iron, I understood clearly what you read and comprehended it the first time. It seems Mr. Mokal is getting confused. This happens a lot to the elderly. Mr. Mokal still thinks Nixon is still President :)
david mokal
11:00 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012
Stick your proof read where the sun dont shine Ill spell the way I want. You have said nothing constructive but crybaby. You sound more like a female who is allways posting about spellchecking. It was a GEEEEEEZER gaurd who saved a kids life on Ferry street remember.
Tom
7:23 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012
The esiest method to help get guns off the streets would be to stop all gun and ammunition sales in your individual town.
Each individual City or Town has the right to dictate what gets sold in their City or Town. Most towns have banned porn shops others have banned bars & alcohol. Immediately stop issuing permits to gun & ammo sellers. Herd the gun sellers like buffalo to city's and towns far away or even out of state.
Dicks Sporting Goods sells Guns & Ammo right in the Square One Mall in Saugus. Nothing like easy access to every 15 year old hanging at the mall to drool over.
paul surette
10:03 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012
Ok, Tom...so you're implying that the 15 year olds have ACCESS to weapons and ammo at Dick's Sporting Goods?
paul surette
10:00 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012
I just knew some reference to violent video games was coming, and you didn't disappoint, Mr. Mokal. Any parent worth their salt wouldn't be letting very young children playing THOSE games. And ifanyone's older kids are playing those games, then proper parenting comes into play in telling the kids video games, are just what they are...VIDEO GAMES!
david mokal
11:06 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012
Aren't you so smart Surette,funny 3 shrinks on the news and talk shows will differ with you about violent video games. The point is that Parents do buy these games and if the parent doesn't buy them they are all over their pal's house watching them. Apparently your not a parent.With all the diffent names you use your probably a regular at the Cyber Cafe.
Who Me?
12:42 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012
The shooter was 20, an Adult, an an avid Gamer......
You know what makes me scratch my head....a few years back....the Army of the Loonies had paper targets, that looked like people, banned. Now mind you they were only silhouettes, and had no real facial features, but by God the Loonies railed against them " these targets could promote someone into shooting a real person"
Yet, these same Loonies will deny and defend that real life looking and realistic video games, showing people being shot, maimed and butchered is absolutely okie dokie.
Getting too old for today's logic I guess.
Mike G.
8:49 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012
Do you know how many Call of Duty games have been sold? Over 16 million. How many school shootings since then...?
Hey, did the shooter like Cheerios? Better take that off the shelves....
Iron Mike
10:36 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012
G'Morning Paul,
I think that Colorado grandfather – just like Mrs. Lanza – was in fear of his life.
I had a friend in the Army about 25 years ago – who had a disturbed kid – lived in mortal fear of what he thought might be 'a homing torpedo'. He'd tried many times to get the court to commit the kid – each time the court said 'he has to commit a serious crime - FIRST...'.
Throughout this series of postings you see people - who understand NEITHER guns or mental illness - making sweeping but simplistic pronouncements about getting guns/ 'clips'/ magazines/ ammunition out of town or out of state.
You see people DEMANDING that WE DO SOMETHING – with no real clue what they're talking about. [They tend to feel the same about 'man-made global warming' and 'dying polar bears'.]
By now it's obvious that schools, churches, malls, and theaters will be targets for the criminally insane – including insane children. The youngest killer on record was just 6.
AND, it's not just an American thing. School killings and massacres occur around the world. In China they use knives...
SO, the rational people will protect the schools, with armed guards and armed teachers, - so that the next madman will be met with trained force. We can learn from the Israelis - who are surrounded by the insane...
Blaming guns and video games is like blaming cars for drunk-driver highway fatalities.
paul surette
11:41 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012
All good points, Mike. I get angry when I see these lunatic advocates against video game violence testify in front of Congressional committees, blaming video games as the root of problems, and NEVER, EVER, mentioning parent's responsibilities. We've become a society of delegating blame where it doesn't belong! Video games somehow have become babysitters!
quasimodo
3:21 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012
What is there to understand about guns? Or have I been missing something all my life?
Who Me?
8:00 am on Monday, December 24, 2012
Good Morning Mike G...Hmmmm....apparently the point of my post has escaped you....
Oh well...might, could be, the pot use....
Diana
10:33 am on Monday, December 24, 2012
Or, alternatively, he was responding to paul's original post. It's not always about you, sweetie.
Mike G.
10:41 am on Monday, December 24, 2012
@Who Me?: I don't know what you're referring to. I don't smoke, but I really don't care about what other people smoke.
reality
11:40 am on Monday, December 24, 2012
plastic mike is a fraud. typical follower or rush "junkie felon" limbaugh, regurgitating disinformation about global warming and mass extinctions. anyone who independently
determines what the facts are "doesn't know what they are talking about" undoubtedly a fake vet also.
Tyler Jozefowicz
10:46 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
Mickie: The Isrealis are surrounded by a people that had their country taken away from them in 1948 and are treated as second class citizens, embargoes on what can go into their "zone', deprived of water supplies and building materials. Stick to the subject
david mokal
10:53 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012
Surette al you n Mike like to do is name call. You set here smokin your fatties trying to upset other posters by calling them Geezers and Moonbats. Get a life and stop crybabying. Thats all your good for is name callin and insults. Remember it was a teacher's MoM who enabled the guns. Lets start there.Further more Iron and Surette you aint got the ballines to say what you say here to someone's face. Your just a phony name on a blog site. You dont bother me one bit. Your just a Girly Man.
NP
11:55 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012
She was NOT a teacher...she occasionally volunteered at the school. Stop saying she was a teacher.
paul surette
11:36 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012
First point, Mr. Mokal....I do NOT smoke pot. Remember the discussion on this thread earlier? You think that people who actually smoke pot walk around aimlessly like zombies and commit crimes, Both of which neither is true! Secondly, I called NO ONE a Moonbat or Geezer. Again, you're confused. You really should seek medical attention, as maybe Alzheimer's is setting in for you. And lastly, Anything I say here, I have said to people's faces. And you know why I get away with it in the real world? Because people actually respect my opinion...because it's an honest one. So go eat your prunes and drink your Ensure! Clearly, anyone trying to get their point across to you is like, well, arguing with a stroke patient!
Who Me?
12:32 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012
What is it then that people do when they smoke Pot?
Diana
1:54 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012
Mostly watch tv and eat stuff that, while technically edible, does not really qualify as "food." I assure you, Reefer Madness was not a documentary, and you have nothing to fear from the scaaaaaaaary Pot Smokers.
david mokal
7:32 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012
You sure sound like you do Surette or is it Iron Mike Or maybe Diane. Hey if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck it must be a duck. Your It. No one respects your opinion Surette cause your just a silly lil person who thinks he knows it all. Im in perfect health dont need the Chit you take. Like I told you before Surette or whoever you are try Coconut OIL on your head so when you pull it out of your butt it won't pop so loud. You foolish lil person.
Mike G.
8:05 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012
Some of the smartest people I know smoke pot. And a lot of the dumbest people I know don't smoke at all.
Anna Bucciarelli
6:33 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013
-:)
Dave Gray
1:01 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012
I'll tell you one thing they don't do - walk into a school with a Bushmaster and slaughter 26 people.
Daniel DeMaina
4:30 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012
A couple of comments have been removed for violating our Terms of Use which state in part, "Without limitation, you agree that you will not post or transmit to other users anything that contains Content that ... contains “masked” profanity."
Try to avoid the personal attacks guys. I'd ask you to consider: "A Democratic Spirit is one that combines rigor and humility, i.e., passionate conviction plus sedulous respect for the convictions of others. As any American knows, this is a very difficult spirit to cultivate and maintain, particularly when it comes to issues you feel strongly about. Equally tough is a D.S.'s criterion of 100 percent intellectual integrity — you have to be willing to look honestly at yourself and your motives for believing what you believe, and to do it more or less continually.
This kind of stuff is advanced U.S. citizenship. A true Democratic Spirit is up there with religious faith and emotional maturity and all those other top-of-the-Maslow-Pyramid-type qualities people spend their whole lives working on. A Democratic Spirit's constituent rigor and humility and honesty are in fact so hard to maintain on certain issues that it's almost irresistibly tempting to fall in with some established dogmatic camp and to follow that camp's line on the issue and to let your position harden within the camp and become inflexible and to believe that any other camp is either evil or insane and to spend all your time and energy trying to shout over them."
david mokal
7:42 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012
Thats right Daniel Practice what you preach. Geeeeezer gaurds and geeeezer security just dont cut it. Thats name calling Daniel. Certain people here like to9 insult and thats what they get off on so why dont you fix it Daniel and dont buddy up. Seems like certain ones get picked out and buddy up against one everytime. You know darn well its the same person using 3-4 different nicks so practice what you preach. Im not going to waste my time with meatheads and the Patch Staff who lets this go on and on. Adios Amigos ! Play time is over. I dont need the insults from your jerko freinds.
Daniel DeMaina
1:19 am on Monday, December 24, 2012
Not really sure what you mean, David. Tried to remind everyone to play nice. I don't think you can play the "certain people here like to insult" card, given the comments I see on this thread. It's not the same person using 3-4 screen names. Haven't "buddied up" to anyone.
david mokal
8:36 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012
http://www.altoonamirror.com/page/content.detail/id/567048.html here ya go more guns
paul surette
12:40 am on Monday, December 24, 2012
Thank you, Mike G....at least you get it! And to our esteemed resident senior citizen, Mr. Mokal, I have three kids. And guess what? They KNOW the difference between right and wrong! You know why? Their parents had the good sense to let them know what right and wrong is, and to not blame OTHERS for their misdeeds. You are a fossil, sir, plain and simple!
Who Me?
8:03 am on Monday, December 24, 2012
You do understand the difference between knowing right from wrong versus those suffering from a mental illness?
Cecil Moore
9:08 am on Monday, December 24, 2012
Harry,
You seem to have a medical understanding and vast knowledge of mental health issues. Are you a professional in the field? I am only asking to qualify your posts as an expert and someone who we all should be actually listening to as a legitimate source of information.
Cecil
david mokal
7:31 pm on Monday, December 24, 2012
Surette you seem to have a hate for seniors. What happened did your Greema beat you up and abuse you. Mike G your full of crap this is the Buddy system on this blog page just team up. Surette your just a lil simpleton and no one cares of what you think. The patch is doing nothing at all to quell this crap of namecalling. Maybe a lil Litigation might be in order. The Malden Attack is the name of this Blog site. You should see a shrink I think with using many personallities you are showing signs of skitzo. You are a very dangerouse person surette feeling the way you do about senior citizens. You could be the next shooter taking out the senior center. Daniel you are wrong! There are team efforts to eliminate certain people and the Patch is in on it because nothing is done.
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/12/24/us/new-york-firefighters-shooting/index.html
Here some more gun violence for ya
Mike G.
11:05 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012
David, some advice on this lovely Christmas day: when you get this worked up at something written on this site, take a breather.
Tyler Jozefowicz
11:15 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
paul: why are you even writing this stupidity? Editor: delete this a personal attack; nothing has been added to the subject. the whole remark is a personal insult, put down.
Iron Mike
8:44 am on Monday, December 24, 2012
Not to seem barbaric or insensitive Folks – but if somebody commits murder...I want them tried fairly, ...and if the evidence is solid,...I want them executed!
Why should honest law-abiding taxpayers be paying for a lifetime of housing dangerous people [including their sex-change operations and conjugal visits] when lethal injection or a firing squad quickly solves the problem. There are good people who need those organs!
Yes, the death penalty IS a deterrent! Merry Christmas Folks! "Happy Holidays" Democrats!
Diana
10:37 am on Monday, December 24, 2012
I'm pretty sure lethal injection and firing squads make organ donation impossible. I'm also entirely unsurprised to find that visions of electric chairs dance in your head on Christmas Eve. Merry happy!
Andrew Sylvia
12:31 pm on Monday, December 24, 2012
Hi Steven,
That'll take some time, but I'll see what I can do with the Chelmsford Police Department.
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
11:56 am on Monday, December 24, 2012
To My Flock,
As a man of the cloth in this holiday season, let me suggest a philosophical approach to make Iron Mike's recommendation acceptable by all. Many find the death penalty abhorrent. For that reason capital punishment has been renamed with a three letter acronym - RBC (Retroactive Birth Control).
Your spiritual advisor,
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
Nikki
12:36 pm on Monday, December 24, 2012
HAAA...I love it! Merry Christmas to you, Reverend, and to all.
Tyler Jozefowicz
11:20 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Rev: Fifth Commandment- "Thou shalt not kill" , no ifs , ands, or buts. Right from the tablet, my man. Praise the Lord. The Mormons, Quakers, Conscientious Objectors and the Amish are the only ones that had it right. Jesus was a pacifist, turn the other cheek stuff, and all Reverends don't join the infantry.
Iron Mike
12:45 pm on Monday, December 24, 2012
How elitist and arrogant of you Mister Cavaretta!
You want information on CHELMSFORD gun owners – so you can burglarize their homes, - or so you can swear out warrants and round them up?
What business on earth is it of YOUR'S who legally owns guns – anywhere? What parts of the words '...shall not be infringed.' do you have the most trouble with?
What do you want to know NEXT, - what people do in their bedrooms, and what TV they watch?
You've just proven to all of us that you are essentially a frustrated left-wing would-be dictator.
TO: Diana:
As a living organ donor I can assure you that the Chinese run a thriving international business in organ transplants. They execute convicts when the recipients show up – single shot point-blank to the base of the skull. Suggest you do a tad of research before you boldly write “I'm pretty sure...”.
Diana
2:03 pm on Monday, December 24, 2012
A single point-blank shot to the base of the skull is wildly different than lethal injection or firing squad, which would rule out organ donation, and is what you actually said.
You could try some memory exercises, or you could re-read the words you just typed to see what we're responding to. Stay away from the Alzheimer's drugs though, they can affect your organs.
The OLD Malden's gone..
8:18 pm on Monday, December 24, 2012
Cavaretta, What IS the point of publishing information on LAW abiding gun permit holders? You going to protest outside their houses? Seriously WHY do it?
Tyler Jozefowicz
11:52 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013
Mike: the part I don't understand is the "well-regulated Militia" part, which is a citizen military force or army. Any organized military forces or armies in Middlesex County. Whose the General? When do they meet for training?
paul surette
5:28 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012
Hold on, Mokal....I just spit my drink on my laptop. First off, I respect most of the elderly....they have seen it all, been there! So there is a lot to learn. You, however, my friend have let your dimentia take over. It seems paranoia has set in for you. You keep making references about 'mulitple identities'. SInce you're only skilled in an abacus, let me enlighten you. YOUR very own computer has a unique identification, called an IP address. IP stands for Internet Provider. Every piece of hardware that is exposed to the internet has an ID. Patch.com has the ability to track every IP address. That means ME as well. Daniel DeMaina has already explained to you that no one here has multiple identities on this thread. He can verify. Secondy, go check Facebook, and do a search for Malden High School Class of 1982. I am on there! We just had our 30th reunion last month. Thirdly: Someone called you a bad name, so you're going to litigate? You trully need medication and attention if you think THAT would ever happen! I will let you know when I'm done laughing!
david mokal
10:15 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012
Tats Right surette IP adresses and they are easy to get. I am in the phone book. Nothin to hide here. See there you go again insulting seniors. Thats all you know how to do? Im class of 66 and my daughters are 81 -82. I dont go to Facebook silly lil playland for middle aged like yourself. Thats where your arogance comes from. Well at least Im glad you did get a laugh. I like to make people laugh. It Christmas and should be time for Laughter. Oh by the way My IP is Verizon.net I have FIOs I hope you think its not to fast for me. I was going to get the Quautum this week but maybe like you say its too fast for me. So what Ill do is go back to my slide rule and abacus. Have a very merry Christmas and a Happy New Year oh by the way another shooting Poter Street last night. Plese dont push us down and rob us after we come out of the senior center. Its not so much for the money its the dam bumps on the head. Merry Christmas.
paul surette
5:31 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012
P.S. Mr. Mokal.....stick to the subject at hand, which was "Have You Reviewed with Your Children What to Do in 'Danger' Scenarios? Should You?"
david mokal
10:27 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012
Surette my gang is the same age as you. We are all Home Boys and Girls raised here 3d generation. I do care and this should not happen. I still say the video gams the violent ones are brainwashing. When I was a kid we were brainwashed into smoking and drinking because it looked manly and glamorous for girls. Last nite on Fox the stats said that many kids are getting 16 hrs of killing people.We have glorified Drug Dealers in the 70's, in the 60's it was kool to be a gangster. So you see even we seniors and our parents were brainwashed. I can imagine what that classroom looked like. Pieces of skull and body parts splattered all over. Bullets exploding in to these little bodies. Yes I do care and would like to see gaurds in everyschool. The times have changed.Lets hope next year they will wake up and make things right. Merry Christmas Happy New Years
Mike G.
10:41 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012
"IP" stands for "Internet Protocol" and only your router's externally-facing network interface would have an IP address visible to the greater Internet.
:)
Merry Christmas.
paul surette
11:01 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012
You're right Mike....I was very tired from work when I wrote my last thread. It is internet protocol.
Mike G.
11:02 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012
I'd be remiss if I didn't correct that, you know.
david mokal
10:42 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012
Now we are coming very close to 2013 and technology is incredibles. This is what I would do. Camera's in every school in and outside. Fingerprint ID at every door,Every child gets a DNA on file. That would be a good start. Large Companies that do Military Work has this,also an eye print. Now this would be manned by a security station in the school.
Iron Mike
10:52 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012
TO All: Merry Christmas.
[To Democrats – 'Happy Holidays!']
I am relieved to see that despite his several days of nasty and obnoxious postings, Mister Mokal has come around to the common sense idea of armed guards in schools. There is hope...
Again, Merry Christmas!
fred
10:53 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012
I have lived in Malden for 57 years. I haven't met any of my blogging friends, but just like the Sopranos, I have gotten to know and like each of you.
Here we go.
Dave, hard worker, grey hair, living a ice quiet retirement. a bit liberal, but conservative values. Makes a great neighbor.
Paul, family man, no nonsense, good athlete, likes to break balls, Fearless, very good for Malden.
AnnieO, tall thin redhead. fearless like paul. Would love to see her in Malden politics. She can make things happen.
Dianna, (snarky), my guess is, handsome curly blonde hair, curvy, has cats. Maybe a school teacher or at least educated at an ivy league school. Total liberal.
Iron Mike, vet, fearless, conservative, good man.
Dave Gray, politics looking good for Gray in Malden.
Mike G, a male Diana, snarky, but well versed in Malden politics.
Mike G.
11:53 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012
Well now, I've been shaving my head for 10+ years now. And I have dogs, not cats.
Diana
12:26 pm on Tuesday, December 25, 2012
Merry Christmas fred. Even though I think you just called me fat. ;)
paul surette
11:04 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012
To Mr. Mokal, as well as the other fellow Patchers....Merry Christmas (yes, I said it, without consulting my lawyer!) Have a safe and wonderful holiday, all!
david mokal
9:29 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012
LOL Happy New Years LOL
paul surette
11:05 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012
I hear that, Mike. I work third shift, and was just off a slightly 'confusing' shift. :)
fred
11:07 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012
Victor, conservative, strong, I share his values.
Carol, hard working italian girl, handsome brunette (I saw your icon) only thing i share with Carol is the hard working italian part. Nice girl, very liberal.
Phe, the best looking army vet to come out of Malden.
There are many more, but have to go. Merry xmass to all.
fred
11:11 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012
Wait, one more, Rev. I enjoy reading you comments. My guess, Malden res for 50 plus years, saw it all. Having fun ragging on these blogs.
M xmass
fred
12:05 pm on Tuesday, December 25, 2012
Merry xmass Mike G, good sport, good guy. Glad you are a part of malden getting better.
Mike G.
1:54 pm on Tuesday, December 25, 2012
Merry Christmas, Fred.
Iron Mike
2:51 pm on Tuesday, December 25, 2012
TO: Ron Powell
>> people likely to use this information
It's a double-edged sword Ron. Burglars intent on ~ simply ~ robing homes of high-end electronics, jewelry, and cash will use it to AVIOD armed homes.
Criminals intent on stealing GUNS [because with records they can't BUY them...] – will use it to target those homes. Both ways – that paper did an evil deed which will aid and abet criminals. THEY don't care – they wanted the sensationalism. Crimes are easy stories to sensationalize.
Ron Powell
3:20 pm on Tuesday, December 25, 2012
True. There is a black market for guns, and this makes the job of criminals involved in it a bit easier. The reality is that criminals will use this information far more often than righteously indignant geetotalers -- a well-intentioned but misguided effort to do "good."
Iron Mike
5:32 pm on Tuesday, December 25, 2012
Very well told Rev! Merry Christmas!
None of these 'liberals' can tell you the number of unarmed innocent people murdered by their own rulers during the 20th Century.
Mike G.
6:18 pm on Tuesday, December 25, 2012
Sigh.
paul surette
4:52 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012
To The Old Malden's gone....good points you made. People like Steven Cavaretta have something new to obsess and be outraged about. I call them 'part-time activists'. I hate to tell you, Mr. Cavaretta, but most folks who own LEGAL firearms, are law abiding citizens. Mike G made a reference earlier about Cheerios. If you want to know if I have a gun, and am registered on a data base, then I certainly have a right to know what kind of cereals you frequent. Only seems fair!
david mokal
9:32 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012
@ Fred at 65 I dont have 1 grey in my head TY. But Paul Is a lil right I am getting a lil ALZAWHICHAMACALLIT. Merry Christmas My Freind and Have a Safe New Years.
david mokal
9:34 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012
To all the posters here I hope everyone had a great Christmas and Please have a safe New Years. HAPPY NEW YEARS EVERYONE !!!!
Iron Mike
10:38 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012
TO: Aron Levy
Sorry Arron, but in your attempt to belittle my knowledge of history, - you've revealed your own vacuum.
The Japanese invasion of Attu and Kiska on 6 June 1942 was a vain attempt to lure our Pacific Fleet north - away from their main objective - Midway. Nimitz wasn't fooled, - but it seems you were. Happy New Year!
Andrew Sylvia
9:28 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Hey guys, settle down. Talk to the topic (danger scenarios with children) and not each other. Thanks.
Andrew Sylvia
10:46 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Hi Steven,
I apologize, I think I miscommunicated here. MGL 66-10 (Public Information law) indicates that information is not open to the public.
Even if it were, I want to apologize for my miscommunication here: I can't speak for other Patches, but in Westford it had always been our policy not to reveal names or anything that would invade the privacy of anyone related to anything involving police with the exception of arrests, and that falls under this.
Now with Chelmsford as well, I think that's appropriate, I'm sorry I didn't say this earlier.
Still, I think it's worth a broader look, a look that doesn't look at individual information or information that violates privacy, but to look at broader statistics.
Thanks for checking in on this.
Ron Powell
12:00 am on Friday, December 28, 2012
Thank you, Andrew, for your journalistic integrity in standing for an appropriate respect for privacy. You are a credit to your profession.
Andrew Sylvia
11:20 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Even if state law did change, I still probably would not feel ethically comfortable with publishing the information of a private citizen possessing a firearm unless it was involved in an alleged crime. But to reiterate, I think generalized statistics would be a good source of discussion.
Jason
10:16 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Publishing that sort of information would cause a crime.
Not all who read, are looking for good banter and democratic ribbing.
Gene Pinkham
2:29 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
The NRA suggested Armed Guards at schools to which NYC Mayor Bloomberg called stupid. The NYC Police School Safety Division has 5,000 Agents and 200 police officers in NYC schools. Agents have Peace Officer authority while on duty and can make Warrantless arrests and use Deadly Force. they made over 900 arrests this year. Go for the salt Bloomy!
saul glick
5:47 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
I am for an armed person at schools. A policeman, or a teacher, would be nice. I like armed marshals on air planes too. I would like more armed persons in religious churchs, also .
quasimodo
1:11 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
I agree with you, except for "religious churchs (sic)". What about NON-religious churches?
kate lipton
11:30 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
For the record - There were armed guards at Virginia Tech and Columbine. And we all know what happened. Therefore, why would you want that? What do you do when one of the "armed guards" goes ballistic? Why not focus on some of the real problems such as easy access to assault rifles?
Ron Powell
12:20 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
It is actually against the law to publish the names and addresses of gun owners in Massachusetts.
MG.L. Chapter 4 Section 7 Article 26
"Public records'' shall mean all books, papers, maps, photographs, recorded tapes, financial statements, statistical tabulations, or other documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency, executive office, department, board, commission, bureau, division or authority of the commonwealth, or of any political subdivision thereof, or of any authority established by the general court to serve a public purpose, unless such materials or data fall within the following exemptions in that they are:
.....
(j) the names and addresses of any persons contained in, or referred to in, any applications for any licenses to carry or possess firearms issued pursuant to chapter one hundred and forty or any firearms identification cards issued pursuant to said chapter one hundred and forty and the names and addresses on sales or transfers of any firearms, rifles, shotguns, or machine guns or ammunition therefor, as defined in said chapter one hundred and forty and the names and addresses on said licenses or cards;
paul surette
12:36 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Just when I was going to have to post that myself, Ron came along and figured it out. Too bad, so sad for you, Mr. Caravetta :) Folks like you, Steve, think EVERYTHING people do sgould be a matter of public record, EXCEPT when it comes to yourself!
Ron Powell
1:01 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
I defend Steve Caravetta's First Amendment right to advocate breaking the law here, but if he actually follows through on his plan and publishes the names and addresses of gun owners, in violation of Massachusetts law, I fully support civil and criminal sanctions against him.
Mike G.
1:46 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Oh for the love of science. This has to be some sort of semi-brilliant trolling.
No person in their right mind with all their faculties about them can seriously suggest that because someone who lives around you owns a gun that your children/pets are unsafe, as if it's the wild west and everyone's running around shooting their guns randomly.
btw, not a gun nut, not a gun owner, and not a republican
Ron Powell
2:59 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Steven,
I believe that if you go back and read what I wrote, I defended your statements on First Amendment grounds. Scroll up two posts and see if you can find that sentence and let me know if you concur. I do note that only one commenter on this story is advocating breaking the law here, and it is you.
And if you live in a town that has a police department, you live near gun owners. And they are in areas where your children and pets play. Fortunately for you, they typically drive a car with blue strobe lights and town markings on the trim. When you see one coming, just tell your children and dog to run and hide.
Who Me?
12:45 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Hmmmmm.....the City with the strictest gun laws is also the most violent.....
Hot damn....there's still darn near 4 days left in 2012 boys.....keep goin'
Of course all these Lic. holders are risking having their cards pulled.
Pay no matter though....Imma thinkin that their firearms are fully insured for them there damages.......
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/12/28/16212238-grim-milestone-chicago-records-500th-homicide-of-2012?lite
quasimodo
1:15 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
I believe it would be very convenient to have the names and addresses of citizens owning fire arms in your community. After all, it would be nice to know with which of your neighbor(s) you can argue safely.
Mike G.
1:24 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Or which neighbors you could rob without encountering too much resistance.
paul surette
1:15 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Quasimodo....'Non-religious churches'? Have you been spiking the eggnog again?
quasimodo
5:15 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Actually, "non-religious churches" were saul glick's suggestion where there should be people carrying arms. ;~))
Gene Pinkham
4:12 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
No armed guards at Columbine. The Security Guard that was there said his gun was in the trunk of his car several blocks away from the school. VT has a general ban on guns on campus including employees.
kate lipton
7:55 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Sorry Gene but what you are saying is absolutely false. I got this info from a reliable source. If I have to I will come up with links for people to verify. Do you really believe
arming schools is the best way to go? Are you saying we can afford this at the same time we can't afford more for the students education. It should be ok to be a Republican and have your own point of view. For New Years lets all get away from the ideology and into genuine facts.
Cecil Moore
8:50 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Kate,
Please check your source again. You cannot possibly be "MORE" wrong. Gene is correct.
Cecil
Gene Pinkham
4:14 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
BTW, Adam Lanza was not wearing Body Armor. He was wearing a Fishing Vest. Great job MSM.
Iron Mike
7:38 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
We the public will likely never learn the full story of Sandy Hook – because too many witnesses are dead, and because über-liberal Connecticut will redact the reports – to 'protect the privacy' of dead people...
But it IS beginning to appear that the mayhem committed by madman Adam Lanza was all done with handguns, - that mom's 'military-style, high-capacity ASSAULT rifle' was in his car, - unused.
Those FACTS won't stop either Diane Feinstein or Steve Cavaretta.
They've made up their minds, - they 'KNOW' how to protect school kids, - and neither facts or our Constitution will stop them.
When copy-cat events occur in Jan and Feb, - they'll howl anew! But they STILL won't support putting retired military and cops as armed guards in schools.
david mokal
9:04 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
The first story I heard was the auto pistols were used then It changed to an assault rifle.Depends which news you were listening too. But regardless these lil kids were massacred whatever he used.
Iron Mike
10:42 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Folks, do NOT expect politicians to engage in ANY meaningful discussion correlating certain mental illnesses – particularly in KIDS – with spree killings.
We'll be lucky if they even mention it.
WHY? Because 'mental illness' [aka Special Needs] has become a multi-billion dollar federal racket. There are more people making a living 'caring for' the mentally disturbed, - and offering soothing reassurance to their parents – than work in the firearms industry.
These 'mental illness caregivers' all vote Democrat. Politicians can count. Easier to nurture the caregivers than bluntly state that SOME mentally disturbed kids NEED to be locked away.
Now before you liberals break your keyboards responding, - remember it was the ACLU and other groups that sued states to empty their asylums back in the 60s. The mentally ill could be 'mainstreamed' – in our schools, even in the workplace. Just months ago Eric Holder authorized hiring retards for the DoJ.
So no liberal politician will give Adam Lanza's mental history a hard look. You'll have to do that. Or you can just blame 'guns'.
kate lipton
11:51 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
To Cecil and Gene, You stand corrected. - If you google this topic you will find numerous articles dealing with this subject. I chose this from UPI.com because it makes mention of both points I had made.
My question for you is: Where is your proof?
"Unfortunately for LaPierre, two disastrous examples directly contradict his position.
On April 20, 1999, Columbine High School had an armed guard--Sheriff's Deputy Neil Gardner on duty on campus. Although Gardner was on duty (he was eating lunch when the shooting started), Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold were able to kill 12 students and a teacher, and wound 21 others and before committing suicide.
And Virginia Tech, which remains the site of the deadliest school shooting in U.S. history, had what amounted to a SWAT team on campus. According to the governor's report on the 2007 shootings that left 32 people dead and 17 wounded, the Virginia Tech police department, a fully accredited police force, has an emergency response team. On April 16, 2007, 34 armed officers were on duty.
Neither Gardner at Columbine High School, nor the Virginia Tech Police force, were able to prevent the events of two of the worst mass gun murders ever to occur in the U.S."
From "Wayne LaPierre, NRA want armed guards in schools but Columbine had one"
Read more: http://www.upi.com/blog/2012/12/21/Wayne-LaPierre-NRA-want-armed-guards-in-schools-but-Columbine-had-one/4111356112309/#ixzz2GPdbopnF
By GABRIELLE LEVY, UPI.com
Randy Winslow
11:47 am on Saturday, December 29, 2012
Upi.com is not a reliable source, not to mention a blog.
Cecil Moore
11:49 am on Saturday, December 29, 2012
Ok Kate, based on your assertions that assault weapons are to be blamed for the tragic deaths of students? Can we now call for the ban on commuter rail trains for running over people pushed on to tracks? How about liquidating Purdue Pharma for manufacturing OxyContin which resulted in 11,427 overdose deaths in the last 5 years. Then we should stop Boeing from making aircraft because they were used to fly into the World Trade Center killing 2,976 people. 200 people are killed using lawn mowers in the US every year, we need to eliminate them. Do you need more examples? The point that many posters have tried to make here is that the problem is not as simple to solve as you propose. The issue of mental health care in the US has far more culpability in the the shooting that the manufacturing of firearms. However, going after the guns is much easier and more politically correct that to turn the microscope inward revealing the true source of blame...the unpredictability of human behaviors. Life in of itself is inherently dangerous and people will never accept there are risks to everything. How many of those who have been victims over the last 20 years have driven without seat belts , smoked cigarettes, or eat a fat filled high caloric diet? Those three simple choices we make in life kill far more people than all the guns, mentally ill, and violence in our lives.
Cecil
Fred Remington
3:23 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
Iron Mike Your use of the word retard is as offensive as the n word please refrain
Daniel DeMaina
9:46 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
A comment has been removed here for violating our Terms of Use which state in part, "Without limitation, you agree that you will not post or transmit to other users anything that contains Content that ... is defamatory, abusive, obscene, profane or offensive ... is threatening, harassing or that promotes racism, bigotry, hatred or physical harm of any kind against any group or individual."
Daniel DeMaina
9:59 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
And I've deleted another comment. In general I like to let the conversation flow as freely as possible, and we're not going to delete every personal insult. But I'm also not going to let it completely degenerate into mudslinging.
Fred Remington
3:52 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
Mike,
God pitty you if you ever find yourself with a mentally disabled grandchild you would think twice before throwing around terms that show plan and simple ignorance this no pc old school bravado is why the grasp of political power is no longer with the GOP
Who Me?
4:33 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
Mike, Fred Remington is of course a "screen name". Also be aware that this "I have a disabled child" has been used repeatedly to attempt to shame people. Used so much in fact that clearly many, if not all, are full of do do. Trust me on this.
David Branga
4:32 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
1- all you folks calling for more gun laws - Do you even know how many lawas are already on the books and what they are?
2 - a mentally disturbed individual with access to legal guns committed an atrocity. The guns didn't do it. They may have made it easier but the gun wasn't the issue: the mental illness of the individual is what caused this
3 - instead iof spending more tax $$$$ which we don't have on armed guards at every school, why not install magnetic type locks on doors that require id badge type access. Making it so you can't open the door without swiping. Also, you could "lock down" the system in the event of a shooter so no door opens period. It would have to be either smashed down by emergency personnel or electronically released. However, the foor would always be able to open from the inside.
Remember, let's not go crazy with emotion over this. It was horriffic but take the time to analyze what happened, how it happened and who committed the act. Less knee jerk and more brain work.
Who Me?
4:37 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
They are using the shooting to promote their true agenda...the banning of all guns, handguns, pop guns, BB guns, you name it.
They have no interest in discussing laws...there's 20,000 gun laws on the books already.
Liberalism....Mental Disorder...
Trust me on this....
Daniel DeMaina
9:57 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
As mental illness keeps popping up here as something that should be studied carefully as a preventative measure, here are some articles that are worth reading:
"Considered a form of high-functioning autism, Asperger's is a neurological disorder generally characterized by difficulties with social interaction and communication with others. Children who have autism may have more severe tantrums and meltdowns than other youths, but the disorder is not typically linked to violence, said Mohan Krishnan, a clinical neuropsychologist who works with children and adults who have Asperger's at Hope Network Behavioral Health Services in Grand Rapids, Mich. "In adulthood, planned acts of violence are not associated with people with Asperger's," Krishnan said:" http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/people-asperger-rarely-harm-don-quick-link-adam-lanza-actions-syndrome-expert-article-1.1221443
"It is commonly assumed that mental illness or stress levels trigger gun violence. But that's not borne out at the state level. We found no statistical association between gun deaths and mental illness or stress levels. We also found no association between gun violence and the proportion of neurotic personalities:" http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/01/the-geography-of-gun-deaths/69354/
Mike G.
11:08 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
Even the notion that Asperger's - or autism, for that matter - is a "mental illness" is a subject for some serious debate.
Mike G.
12:11 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
Just to clarify, Daniel, not refuting your post at all, just adding another point for discussion :)
Tim
12:36 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
maybe the people on the right could take a lesson from Sarah Palin, and stop using the R word.
Ron Powell
5:11 pm on Sunday, December 30, 2012
I second Jon's call to refrain from using words that are known to offend many people. I also think that Daniel's point is key here: there is no association between gun violence and Asperger's. And it would be very hard to determine if an applicant has a mental disorder that makes him or her an unacceptable risk to own a gun. Unless there is a prior criminal record, you would be relying on the applicant to self-report.
Rusty
11:19 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
Someone asked me why I carry a .45 cal. I answered because they don't make a .46!!
Iron Mike
11:19 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
My point Folks – however crudely some of you took it – is that WE DON'T KNOW – and will likely NEVER KNOW what Lanza's TOTAL mental problems were.
Why?
Because the State of Connecticut [like most states] will consider his mental and physical records 'private'. So we'll put more kids at risk to protect the 'privacy' of a dead spree killer.
Most mental patients are relatively harmless. But some are violent, quick to anger, - hold grudges for imaginary insults, - and become homicidal. There are events which trigger their spree killing.
And in almost every case thus far reported – SOME people in position of authority either did nothing, - or tried to continue mainstreaming them.
Easier to blame 'guns' – than do early identification of dangerous and homicidal kids. Klebold and Harris were well known troublemakers and misfits – and the 'experts' did nothing... Then of course, - they blamed the guns.
Daniel DeMaina
11:42 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
Steven, I removed the post, not Mike, and spoke with him privately about that. You're free to disagree with Mike, and vehemently, but you're going to have reign in the insults.
Tim
12:34 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
Daniel, is "iron"mike going to reign in his offensive behavior? That is the crux of the problem here. I don't care what side of the aisle you sit on, he is offensive.
Tim
12:42 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
but mike, if these tools intended for killing weren't available, they wouldn't be able to kill like they do. why can't you fathom that. that is not the primary purpose of hammers, of knives or cars. why can't you fathom that. is it too deep for you?
Ron Powell
10:04 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
I think that Steven somehow missed that the correct response to being admonished for bad conduct was "I'm sorry and I will stop it."
Anna Bucciarelli
12:16 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Gotta step in here, days late, I know, but Iron Mike, I have just been waiting for someone to insinuate, as the media did early on, that the primary cause of this guy's horrible act(s) was due to an off-shoot of the Autism spectrum known as Asergers(sp?) ... turns out that was not the case and I so strongly object to the assumption that an individual within the spectrum has a mental illness and is dangerous. Fact is these are usually very docile individuals who are in a world of their own and, mainly, their problem is with processing information/communication. If anything, they are usually only self abusive and that comes from their frustration at not being able to communicate ... please do not confuse mental illness with a disability that has not a thing to do with the mind, simply to do with (I think) how the electrodes within the system do not, for whatever unknown reason, allow the individual to think, act and speak as we do. Trust me, there is a great difference.
Iron Mike
8:35 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
>> if these tools intended for killing weren't available, they wouldn't be able to kill like they do.
Balderdash Jon! Absolute Balderdash. In China and Japan spree killers of school children use knives. Please read the news – or google the facts.
In Cambodia most of the 1.9 million killed were killed with shovels and knives – bullets were in short supply. In Rwanda in 1994 the Tutsi and Hutu used machetes and hoes to kill 800,000+ of each other – in just 100 days.
It is simply a mindless left-wing knee-jerk reaction to blame 'guns' for the actions of the pathologically insane. The 'special needs industry' stands between us and the truth, - and they have way more votes than the NRA.
Outlawing guns won't stop spree killings. Outlawing drunk driving didn't stop drunk driving deaths – often by serial repeat offenders. Outlawing bank robbery hasn't ended bank heists. Outlawing alcohol with the 18th Amendment merely gave birth to a nationwide criminal empire.
Is this all too deep for you?
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
9:09 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
The special needs 'industry' is something to behold. I know of two families... quite well off financially, with skills such that they could live anywhere in the country. After careful research they both moved to Massachusetts because of the Commonwealth's 'free' services for autistic children. One family moved from California - it's hard to believe our benefits are more liberal, but they are. A teacher friend tells me it can cost $300,000 per year and up to treat and school these children. But as we know, there is no limit to other people's money.
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
Tim
9:34 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
outlawing drunk driving hasn't prevented deaths, because they didn't eliminate cars from society. If there aren't any guns, people can't kill with them. Why can't you see that. And the school attack in China left people with knife injuries, not deaths.
deranged people are always going to find a way, why are you so intent on making it so easy for them?
Tim
9:36 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
and rev, what is your brilliant solution. you never offer a solution, but merely blow the same old one note. Blame the liberals.
paul surette
9:53 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
All excellent points, Mike...especially regarding the Volstead Act and drunk driving!
saul glick
9:56 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
I love it Rev. i would like to see some stats on sprecial education success after they are done with it. I have a couple of sped graduate stories also. Both were total waste of money. I think your figure of 300k is a little low.
Andrew Sylvia
10:23 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
Personal insults to other users will not be tolerated. We've been far too lenient on this matter on this article so far. Comments have been deleted under the terms of use, further violations of the terms of use can lead to account suspension at will.
Mike G.
12:32 pm on Sunday, December 30, 2012
It's time to close the comments on this article, IMO. Account suspension is no threat to people here, I'm afraid.
Iron Mike
10:28 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
My more conservative brethren will carefully note that the Liberal reaction to spree killings in schools, malls, theaters, and churches is to BAN GUNS.
They give NO THOUGHT to investigating the DNA and medical history of the killers – 'that would be an invasion of privacy'.
So they'll shred our Constitution instead.
I say – if they really CARED ABOUT HELPLESS CHILDREN – then child rape in this state would warrant the Death Penalty.
But,...what's the worst John Burbine is facing? Life? With conjugal visits and a state-funded sex-change operation? He video-taped over 100 acts of himself raping infants and toddlers. Any of these LIBERALS demanding we ban video cameras and computers?
NO! Even liberals find computers and cameras essential to their lives. Hmmm! Any of them ever stop a mugger or a home invader with a computer? "We don't NEED computers!!!"
Tim
10:48 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
liberals aren't interested in shredding the constitution. We the people have the right to amend it.
How many home invasions and muggings have you stopped, mike?
Mark
10:55 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
FASCISM -
Any Movement, Ideology or Attitude that Favors Dictatorial Government, Centralized Control of Private Enterprise, And Repression of All Opposition.
Sounds Like The Insanity that is being Spewed by Obama and other leftwing wannabe tyrants.
Thank God for the 2nd Amendment!
Tim
11:05 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
Fascism is considered by certain scholars to be right-wing because of its social conservatism and authoritarian means of opposing egalitarianism. Roderick Stackleberg places fascism—including Nazism, which he says is "a radical variant of fascism"—on the right, explaining that "the more a person deems absolute equality among all people to be a desirable condition, the further left he or she will be on the ideological spectrum. The more a person considers inequality to be unavoidable or even desirable, the further to the right he or she will be."
Tim
11:06 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
if fascism seems to be to your left, you are so far past the extreme right to be taken seriously.
Andrew Sylvia
10:57 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
Hey people, we just got a ton of snow. Anybody want to talk about that?
Tim
11:02 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
that's kind of off topic, Andrew
Ron Powell
11:22 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
It's only seems off topic if you don't accept that guns were responsible for the snow, Jon.
Andrew Sylvia
11:59 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
Jon, just a reminder that there are other articles to comment on here on Patch.
Mark
11:06 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
Why was the Second Amendment so pivotal as to occupy the second place in the list?
It is precisely because The Gun is the single instrument that man has devised that renders equal the weak and the strong, the young and the old, the male and the female. It makes the gay man the equal of the half-dozen homophobes in a truck taunting and threatening to drag him behind it with a rope until he dies. It makes the 90lb woman the equal of the 225lb would-be-rapist. It makes the 60-year old shopkeeper the equal of the 18-year old iron-pumping thug.
And finally, and most-importantly, it makes the people, individually and collectively, the equal of the government.
The founders understood that without unfettered individual ownership of firearms there is no such thing as a Constitutional Republic. There is instead "democracy" -- which is best described as the bigger or more-numerous you are the more rights you have.
This, of course, means that if you're small, frail, unpopular or singular....
You have no rights at all!
Iron Mike
11:38 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
VERY WELL said Mark! Bravo!
When seconds count, - 911 is just minutes away, - to be followed by a left-wing know-it-all who will try to confiscate the gun you just used to save your life.
Given the subject of the blog - what do you tell your kids - I've seen NOTHING about that.
Tim
12:02 pm on Sunday, December 30, 2012
when was the last time either of you used a gun to save your life? you need to put away these fantasies, and accept the fact that guns were devised for one purpose: to kill.
Ron Powell
4:42 pm on Sunday, December 30, 2012
Jon, I have heard that argument used a lot -- that the only purpose of guns is to kill. But here's the problem with that argument: there are 280 million guns in the US, and there were about 9,400 gun homicides last year. That means that 99.9997 percent of guns were not used to kill. There are 80 million gun owners in the US. That means that 99.998 percent of gun owners did not use their weapons to kill. It's not intellectually honest then to argue that the only purpose of guns is to kill when few guns are actually used to kill.
The question then becomes what are the other uses of guns? By far, the most common reason for owning a gun is a deterrent against crime. Second is for target shooting, and third is for hunting. I guess you can argue that hunting is killing animals; however, I assume that you mean guns are devised to kill people. Let's be honest and agree that the vast majority (almost all) gunowners own their weapons for some other purpose than killing someone.
Mark
11:09 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
The gun-banners would have you believe that the Second Amendment is some quaint notion -- an anachronism. They claim that "The Gun" is an instrumentality of violence and death; that its primary purpose is to kill people and that's what it mostly does. They point to the 10,000 or so homicides with guns a year in support of this.
But these people not only ignore reasonably-recent history, including Nazi Germany, Rwanda and many other instances (indeed there are 200 million people, nearly all disarmed, that governments have murdered outside of "war" in the last 100 years!) but they also ignore the very facts of today.
The fact of the matter is that of those 10,000 homicides about half are black-on-black violence committed by young black men against other young black men. Many are in fact "mutual combat" over something that we rendered illegal unconstitutionally (mostly drug-related), thereby removing their access to peaceful means of settling disputes (the courts.) And worse, the highest prevalence of those crimes are found in places where it is nearly impossible for a law-abiding citizen to be defensively armed. Those victims pay with their lives for the unconstitutional laws that have been imposed upon them.
Ron Powell
4:50 pm on Sunday, December 30, 2012
Gun laws target African American men. Of the people currently in jail for owning an illegal weapon as their primary offense, 50 percent are African-American, 21 percent are Latino, and only 28 percent are white. That is 3,861 African-American men sitting in jail for no other reason than they were in possession of a weapon that they were not legally licensed to carry or registered to own.
Mark
11:11 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
All the above is compliments of Karl Denninger for thoughtful debate. http://market-ticker.org/
Iron Mike
12:11 pm on Sunday, December 30, 2012
TO: Jon
>> when was the last time either of you used a gun to save your life?
Twice in my lifetime [not counting Vietnam]. Neither time did I need to fire - just showing it was enough to send the vermin running.
Jon, if your entire life has been lived without fear - you are lucky. Not everybody is that lucky. The day your luck runs out - you may die fumbling with the buttons on a cell phone, - trying to reach a cop - with a gun.
Who Me?
3:33 pm on Sunday, December 30, 2012
This is Tewksbury Patch....did you get hurled off your hometown blog Waltham Patch?
Tim
3:45 pm on Sunday, December 30, 2012
scroll all the way up top and have a look,brainiac. This is not the tweksbury patch.
Who Me?
3:49 pm on Sunday, December 30, 2012
Well...it does say Tewksbury Patch on my computer....
And you know the very best part...I even spelled Tewksbury correctly!
Ron Powell
5:18 pm on Sunday, December 30, 2012
In fairness to Who Me?, these regional stories tie up the feeds of all towns in the region. Who Me? is most likely seeing Tewksbury Patch at the top of his screen. It's a complaint that I've registered before with the Patch.
Who Me?
3:39 pm on Sunday, December 30, 2012
This was sent to me by a concerned reader. It seems I have been picking on the rabid anti-gun folks who actually are suffering from a real mental disorder. Picking on them is the same as say picking on any other type of disability. To those who suffer from this affliction I deeply apologize.
And while I'm at it...for those who have the double affliction of Left Wing Lunacy and Hoplophobia....you truly have my deepest sympathy....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoplophobia
Iron Mike
6:03 pm on Sunday, December 30, 2012
TO: Ron Powell
>> Gun laws target African American men.
Thus one could conclude that guns laws – always proposed and passed by liberals – are racist. The first gun laws were designed to keep freed slaves from owning them. Yep, Democrats! Same bunch that formed the KKK and wrote Jim Crow laws.
Revisionist History: A specialty of Modern Democrats.
How many will ask for armed guards in their kids' schools, - and how many will rant about 'outlawing guns' – while sending their kids into undefended schools next month?
Ron Powell
7:54 pm on Sunday, December 30, 2012
It might be over-the-top to conclude that gunlaws are passed with racist motives in mind, but I think that it is at least fair to consider whether you want to pass laws that would be used to target otherwise law-abiding people disproportionately by race. Remember, these are people who did not commit any other crime other than possessing a weapon that was not licensed or registered.
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
6:53 pm on Sunday, December 30, 2012
Ron,
A course in logic... even high school level would do you some good. You would learn the distinction between cause and effect.
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
Ron Powell
7:39 pm on Sunday, December 30, 2012
Context?
Anna Bucciarelli
12:38 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
My dear sir, Rev. E Raleigh Pinperton III, please refer to your comment of 12/30/12, in which you make reference to the special needs "industry" in MA. I am late to this post but your comment blistered my soul. Let me ask you, wise man that you are, if you had a child with an unusual, very special need, would you not seek help wherever you could? If it meant you needed to move Heaven and earth for services and all of your advocacy in your town/state still did not provide it, would you not go where you needed to go for the child's benefit? Please do not repeat figures you "heard" about, all education is expensive even for the individual child in a regular classroom, more than $10,000/year/child in some towns. Multiply that by the # of years an average child attends school and what figure do you come up with? It happens that MA was a pioneer in providing for spec. needs kids, that's true, and I take part of the responsibility for that since I and a number of parents of kids (who were unserved or underserved, in basement rooms of schools, hidden from the regular school population and given nothing but quiet busy work with not a thought to enhance their capabilities or prepare them to live in society, locking out the instincts and advice of parents) spent years in advocacy and writing of regulations for Chapter 766 until it was implemented in 1974, then PL94-142, the Federal SPED law took over and I worked on that as well. You, sir, should applaud this commonwealth, not berate
Anna Bucciarelli
12:46 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Pinperton continued ... it for providing for all of its citizens, especially the less intellectually fortunate. I advise you to examine your soul and really ask yourself how you would handle a situation in which you find you need to bury (in your mind) a child you thought you had only to find that he/she has an entirely different way of learning that requires an individual plan (which, in my opinion, every school-aged child SHOULD have, rather than assume they all learn the same way). Be generous in your thoughts ... we are all God's children and all our brother's keepers. If you are truly a Rev., you should know that and not need me to lecture to you.
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
6:47 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Anna,
Your self-serving tirade misses the point. Nowhere did I suggest these children should not be treated with the best of care. I suggested that providing this treatment 'free' in Massachusetts has resulted in our state becoming a magnet for parents who know a bargain when they see one. Without financial needs testing we can expect the influx to continue. Free products or services tend to have large demand.
Finally 'special needs' has become an industry in the Commonwealth. 'Advocates' like yourself scream at any criticism of industry practices or the growing list of perceived rights, wants and 'needs.'
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
Joe Lynch
1:17 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
ANNA..........even those who represent themselves as "preachers" need to be lectured once in a while by the folks they preach to. Loved your passionate and well thought through response. Keep up the terrific work you and others do on behalf of kids who need you.
Joe Lynch
Somerville, MA
fred
1:51 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Great posts Anna. Old Snarky was starting to get to you in earlier post. You are one special lady. Snarky, layoff Anna, she's a good girl.
Anna Bucciarelli
4:41 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Reverend ... put a sock in it. You don't know what you're talking about. Public schools are "free" to all children, paid for by our taxes. I would sincerely like to look at your statistical facts re: the # of children being served who are not MA residents to begin with. Also, the likes of me need to be what you call self serving since the likes of you would have us all in a closet with our kids. I take umbrage at your reference to me as a screamer, I am anything but, I work with the system and the powers who can affect change and when I see injustice, I work for justice and change, and further, I am highly respected in the legislative circles that have an interest in providing equal education for all children. I suggest you not rely on hearsay and that you think before you speak, sir, and consider your words ant to whom you make inappropriate remarks.
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
6:38 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Anna writes,
"...and further, I am highly respected in the legislative circles..."
That's all that counts. Carry on, Anna.
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
Anna Bucciarelli
7:22 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
You are a fool with nothing but foolish comments because you cannot produce facts.
Anna Bucciarelli
7:16 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
To the question of this post ... yes, discussion should take place with children, there's no hiding the situation and I feel the only way to discuss this with children is to simply assure them that what happened was not a thing that happens in any ordinary day or time, that the incident was a phenomenon and in no way can they expect a repeat performance of such activity. I don't necessarily know that to be fact but it seems to me the only comfort to give child. We all hope it doesn't happen again so why not pass on such hopeful thoughts. I cannot imagine the fear that kids face after such an incident but I bet it's monumental and my goal would be to help them to feel as safe as possible. Not sure I really know how to do that, but these are my thoughts on the matter.
Andrew Sylvia
9:15 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Hey folks, calm down.
Anna Bucciarelli
6:50 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013
You're right Andrew ... I apologize to you for my temper, but not at all to the "man of the cloth".
fred
6:59 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013
And I apologize to the rev. Your post are great. The old snarky I was refering to was my favorite, Dianna.
Anna, the rev is good and makes all the sense in the world.
Mike G.
8:31 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013
Diana's posts are pretty good too. People shouldn't take themselves so seriously...
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
7:41 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013
Thank you Fred. It gets rather lonely here at Our Lady of Perpetual Misery. Anna cannot help herself. Being an "advocate" makes It is difficult to have a rational discourse. If you only have a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
Your spiritual advisor,
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
Anna Bucciarelli
8:47 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013
Would like to know, seriously, what you stand for. Your comments, on this post and many others, express nothing but disdain and bitching.
Mike G.
10:16 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013
If you want rational discourse, it helps to not be condescending.
Anna Bucciarelli
1:04 pm on Thursday, January 10, 2013
Mike G. ......... Tried and failed!